Search results

I finally decided that John Ramsey is just in denial. He could never admit to himself that his wife was a nut job who killed their daughter. I don't think he had any active role in covering up the crime, he took his cues from Patsy and then helped her tacitly by stonewalling and protecting...

This is all I can find on US kidnapping http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/anderson.cooper.360/blog/2007/01/raw-data-kidnapping-statistics.html Out of 800,000 cases 115 met the criteria for stereotypical stranger kidnapping. No mention of ransoms...but I'd say we are talking fractions of a...

She cannot be excluded. Add that with the fact that it was written inside the house, that a practice note was written, that she was trying to disguise her handwriting and the complete insanity of a kidnapper writing a ransom note after entering the home instead of before, the contents of the...

LOL, well only ONE PERSON wrote it, so John Ramsey being excluded means little, one of the two of them would have to be excluded, since two people didn't write the note, one person did. Ergo, Patsy Ramsy, who cannot be excluded, is a good bet to have written the note. Does anyone know of any...

How does the ransom note point away from the Ramseys? It was written on their paper, with their pencil, with a practice note discarded and it mentions a dollar figure that can ONLY have come from insider knowledge about Ramsey's finances. And then there's that whole thing about there not...

I may be wrong, but I am about 99% certain that you would never in a million years convict someone based only on the fact that minute particles of skin cells were found on the victim when it is not only possible, but plausible that they were secondary tranfer.

I've never been able to get past the fact that this crime requires the mixing of too many genres. The sexual sadist rapist/killer who doesn't rape her, uses small cord as ligature and then redresses her, puts a blanket on her and puts some of her favorite items around her. The pedophile...

If she had been 12 or 13, I'd agree. But 6? And with a problem having 'accidents'? If the crotch DNA was semen or saliva, I'd also agree. But it was DNA that was found in a drop of blood/her own bodily fluids, not from semen, and I think either not saliva or too small to determine. Why...

It seems so unlikely to me that someone who could have known about the $117K figure who had no alibi for that night could have been overlooked by police or the Ramsey's who accused just about anybody they could think of....this guy, who knew the layout of the house, knew about John Ramsey's...

While I think its very possible that an intruder can come into a home and leave no DNA, no hair, no fibers...I think its highly unlikely that an intruder can do everything that THIS intruder did and leave no trace evidence except on the clothing of his victim. He touched her body with the...

I have not changed my opinion. I believe Patsey Ramsey accidentally killed her daughter and in a panic, staged the sexual assault and attempted kidnapping. If the DNA is ever matched to a sex offender or someone who was in Boulder at the time of JonBenet's death and who does not have an...

It's my vague recollection that the DA took it to the grand jury because of public pressure and that while nobody knows exactly what was presented,there are some strong indications that a lot of evidence pointing to the crime scene being staged was not put before them.

How could her parents skin cells on her clothing possibly be evidence of their guilt? If their DNA was found on the paint brush/tape/restraints, etc. then I would agree. But mom or dad's skin cells found on a child's clothing? It would mean nothing. If was saliva or semen...that's a...

I guess I could theoretically see looking in on your child and not waking him up, not wanting to freak him out with all the commotion. BUt I can't see making phone calls or inviting anyone over if you truly belived your daughter had been kidnapped for ransom, might be alive, and did not know...

Well, there it is then. If you believed your child was really kidnapped you would do NOTHING until police arrived and then do whatever they told you. You would absolutely not be blatantly disobeying the orders of the kidnappers, tying up the phone and inviting people into the house.

See that's the thing... If they had gone into pure panic mode at the ransom note, called police and then waited by phone in a panic, done nothing other than go get Burke..then maybe that is believable, that they didn't search the house, they assumed the ransom note was real, JonBenet was gone...

You don't think the first thing a parent would do is search the ENTIRE HOUSE? Good grief, the Ramseys' didn't even stay off the freaking telephone before their daughter's body was found?! Who says he has to take her back out the basement window? He's already in the house and has the girl...

What's the rush to exonerate the Ramsey's then? She couldn't wait until the DNA had run through CODIS, to possibly get a hit and actually apprehend this alleged intruder??????????

Yep, you said it better than I did. We already see it to some degree, with defenses blabbing about 'untested evidence' all the time, and unidentified hairs and fibers found...and sadly, people increasingly are buying the idea that if every single item in a house isn't tested and every single...