Search results

Will any local WS folks be attending? If yes (and especially if he's glanced at WS even a little), then he (BC) might otherwise really want to come, but find the thought... (ahem)... somewhat disconcerting. Seriously though... any local WS folks potentially interested in attending (depending...

Agree here too! [ From my side, just because I think it's unlikely there were any other trips shouldn't be taken as a negative against MT3. I suspect there is some explanation for the data she got for (circa) 4am trip - as others have said, possibly mis-informed source, possibly mis-spoken...

FWIW, it does seem like, given the recent publications, that a number of folks on this forum are of the opinion that there were likely no other HT trips "of interest" except for the ones now disclosed. I don't know if MT3 is still of the opinion that there were other HT trips "of interest"...

How do we know he is still on admin leave? Maybe he's back at work (do we know for sure otherwise?) Or, maybe he's back at work, off leave, but working from home/remote.

Yes, that's the connection. Good work. Wade S (along with Bernie Segal if I recall) were co-defense lawyers of MacDonald down the stretch. Jim Blackburn of course was the NC prosecutor at the time, and this case put him 'on the map'. Wade is one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs in the...

Two case questions: (1) In the "response to Rentz complaint" document, it's mentioned that BC has been 'denied any access to the autopsy information, as well as any information related to the murder of his wife'. Is this typical in an ongoing investigation (even if the spouse may not be...

That's a blast from the past CP. There's actually a (small) "connection" between the Cooper case, and the MacDonald case... everyone already know what that is? [ I'm sure RC does, so give someone else a chance to respond RC... :) ]

Agree with SG here... [hope that doesn't influence you to change your mind SG... ;) ] I think his primary motivies in the recent moves are to do any and everything he can think of to try to get the children back. He doesn't have any prior experience in this area, so he's not going to be an...

Perhaps - I guess I just took as a a way to establish that him thinking she had plans to run with CC on Saturday, is not necessarily an unreasonable thing. JA not knowing anything about it, doesn't make it less reasonable. [ This is my 'take' on why he made these specific statements regarding JA ]

I guess I just don't totally agree with this one that's all (sorry SG). A female capable of running a steady (if improved) 13.1 mile race, simply does not equate to that same person being able to outsprint an (even an out-of-shape) male predator for a short distance. Sorry, it just doesn't...

Wait though... I thought JA had implied (somewhere) that since she was unaware of NC's plans to run with CC, that in her eyes (JA's eyes), it made it unlikely that it was true. In other words, I thought JA kinda stated (somewhere), that she was the primary running partner, and would be aware of...

To me this is unclear. Fitness is relative. BC is just suggesting that NC was fitter than some of the new females she had introduced to running in the neighborhood. He wasn't suggesting she was in Olympian form, or even an "above average" female runner. Just that her aspirations for the...

Are we sure he didn't/hasn't at any point in time? Or does LE have to disclose all dialog/info that BC disclosed thus far in SW affidavit they submit? If not, then maybe that level of detail (the particulars of the argument) were discussed, and ncsu95's example could very well be viable: they...

Agree, it's hard to know. I guess the "picture painted" in the original affidavit (at least what seemed to me) was one where BC just went AWOL during those periods, with no regard for his family or NC, etc. That was the "sense" I was getting from the plaintiff affidavits telling of it. [...

I guess I missed where he publicly attacked the Rentz family recently...(even in the submitted subpoenas - not sure I see anything that I'd categorize as a "attack" on the plaintiffs) Maybe I missed something?

Don't the phone records at least suggest that there were attempts being made to communicate during time periods where plaintiff affidavits have asserted there was no communication?

BC's rebuttal affidavit doesn't come across to me as a slam on any of NC's friends at all. To me, it comes across as "matter of fact" responses to their accusations. Their affidavits seem subjective, whereas BC's rebuttal seems much more objective, and again, matter-of-fact. The only (mild)...

Uhhh... SG... given this case... care to share exactly where and when did you get your MBA... (just checking). :crazy: ;) ;)

So RC, you think BC may have committed the crime after returning from the 2nd trip to HT?

Good points Anderson. I guess I'm just saying that it doesn't surprise me that they would ask for a dismissal. I also wonder about the terms coming out of the meeting on the 25th, and I wonder about what compelling information was presented at the ex-parte. The ex-parte could have been...