I still don't see where the phone being found by the mailbox is coming from. OT, but IMO it would really help to have a wiki or something where facts backed up by evidence could all be kept in a single location. In the long threads here it seems sometimes someone ponders something or throws...
To play devil's advocate, it would also fit an abduction perfectly well IMO. Someone sneaks up on her, grabs her, and the phone is dropped in the struggle. Or the perp takes it from her and throws it down at the scene.
I'm not seeing gloves. I don't see any delineation either between two gloves or between the fingers of a single glove. Looks like one large item with a couple crinkles. Picture is kind of low res though.
What he said about the phone is pretty ambiguous to me - seems like it could mean anything from that was simply the last time she made or received any texts/calls, to the phone being physically powered off. I think unless it's clarified it's hard to say what it means really.
I took the intersection to be where the reporting person was waiting for the officer, not necessarily where he saw the 415 disturbance, which could have been somewhere else. I think it's hard to say without someone who's more versed in the formatting of these logs.
It was the sheriff in the video saying the phone connections went dead around noon, not Keith. I imagine he means that was the last text or call made, though it's hard to say for sure.
Was just digging a little bit more in Photobucket. Looks like it hasn't been used in quite some time. The most recent photos on there (from Halloween) are still from back in 2008. Not trying to say anything other than people should be aware they're all quite old.
The only other thing of...
Just looks like your standard insensitive internet troll to me. There are some weird people out there, and these stories always seem to bring them out - that's for sure.
Some people just get blinders and can only see one possible scenario. Also, can't imagine many "forensic psychologists" have profile photos like that and write exclusively in ALL CAPS.
As others have already said, it could be her DMV photo. It could also be her passport photo where you're actually not allowed to smile from what I remember.
What made you jump to an enhancement surgery? FYI the picture you're referring to is almost 13 years old, from 2004. She was likely 21 or 22 in that photo.
Does anyone know if taking out a personal protection order is something that would show up in the Shasta courts case index? I only ask because searching Sherri's name the only things that come up is a minor traffic issue and her divorce. Personally, I don't think it's out of the ordinary to get...
Not a moderator, but I'm going to guess no on the first part as I don't believe he's officially been named a suspect. The last news article I read specifically said they wouldn't name him because of that fact.
Hmm, I don't remember anything about the scent dogs losing the scent in the driveway either. Just that they didn't pick anything up where they found the phone and earbuds.
Yeah, LE has definitely been tight-lipped. Still, it seems like something the husband or sister would have mentioned in interviews. The half-wrapped present and car being home were mentioned, but nothing about her purse/wallet. I feel like those things being left behind would be a big red flag...
I've read through everything up to now, so my apologies if I've missed it, but has either the husband or LE mentioned anything about whether her wallet/purse was left at home? Or if there's been any activity on her cards? I wouldn't imagine she'd take either running, so if they're missing it...
I believe another poster looked at the source of the page after it was posted and found this image was uploaded almost 10 years ago, so I'm not sure how much I'd read into it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.