Search results

I believe there was testimony that he entered the Canton Police Office at 1:30 am - so if he left at 12:30 where did he go? Oops - posted before I saw the previous ones about 1:30 arrival - waiting on my coffee to brew and trial coverage to begin.

Thank you for the clarification - HOW have I survived all of these years watching trials, sitting in courtrooms, being married to a lawyer without knowing what "burden of proof" means??? If you refer to my original comment - I was responding to this: "Did they prove that Proctor being angry...

The point is the defense did not have to prove anything...(I'm sure you already knew that!)

At least they *have* pictures of the vehicle...unlike the CW. But notice how the CW *did* have clear photos of JO's car, however, so I found that a bit suspicious.

According to journalists who were in the courtroom, the 3 jurors not deliberating (2 alternates and the 1 juror dismissed by the judge on the last day) were the 3 who appeared most "engaged with the defense testimony and expert witnesses." I wonder if the dismissed juror will speak out after...

Hoping and praying there are jurors who paid attention and realize she cannot be found "guilty of drunk driving" that all of the charges require her to have hit him with her vehicle (which - if they listened and believed the expert FBI witnesses was impossible.)

-p0=[9¿'.;[[[ Not Guilty!

The judge laughed first - and every lawyer and former prosecutor that has commented on this today has stated that the judge was wrong and very unprofessional.

I think she was laughing at the "That's how we do things MA, Mr. Jackson!" Thinking...yes, that's how you try to railroad innocent people here and are mad you are being confronted about it on national TV. Bev was obviously angry and lashing out this morning. Praying the jury will not be...

No one seems to know exactly what is being investigated. I have to think it might be related to corruption/planted evidence. Why would they go to the trouble and expense to hire these excellent reconstruction engineers unless they have suspicions along that line? It's not likely they did...

A continuation of how things went during the trial. He can eat up more time talking about nothing than anyone I've ever listened to! It frankly gets on my nerves so much, I frequently had to mute him.

Exactly - also, it was stated that she planned to return to her own home that evening so she expected him to come home to be with the kids. She was not planning to spend the night at his house and it was out of character for him to not return home as planned.

Yes - it also proves he could not have fallen/been knocked down in the street, hit his head and crawled across the lawn to the location where he was found. This was very important evidence in my opinion!

The witness stated that the speed was determined by Dr. Wolfe as the average speed an adult male his size would throw an object. (I had wondered this also, so noticed this point in direct examination by Jackson.)

Sort of like you can claim you have "video footage" of KR's car hitting JO! Same moral compass (or lack thereof!)

I agree but you never know what each member of the jury is thinking. This dog bite evidence/expert might be the thing that convinces one juror and it is Karen's right to defend against "the tail light did it!" theory. After weeks and weeks ad nauseam of the prosecution witnesses, surely this...

BBM - I found it pretty obvious that the prosecution could not find a single, reliable, educated expert who was willing to testify about the vehicle in a manner that supported their theory. It is their reputation after all and a great many people are watching. Therefore, this guy, with a...

I've said this over and over...WHY were there no clear photos taken of the back of Karen's vehicle? Compare the grainy videos and blurry shots on the tow truck to the clear, stellar photos of John's vehicle! It's unbelievable! When a tree fell on my garage I took dozens of photos from every...

I don't see how the jury can make heads or tails from this witness.

That bedroom picture is yet another example for the books. Remember in the closing when McGuinness alluded to some quirky things between MT and FD? ("fooling around" in the car with JD's blood present, telling detectives about their shower sex, etc.) The picture is (MOO) highly inappropriate to...