Search results

wow...hadn't even tied those 2 together. Could she have driven there, picked out a spot, dug a hole and driven back in 1 hr? The neighbor said she borrowed it for about 1 hr. Then again, did the neighbor say she left after she borrowed it? I got the feeling she was at the house, with her car...

You are right, I stand corrected. I was told this a while back. Thought it was called "early" reading but pre-reading makes much more sense. Neither here nor there, really - I seriously doubt a 22 month old would be pre-reading. Although, from the sound of it, possibly your child was...

Exactly!! I have 4 children and come from a family of educators. That is early reading.

I didn't even think about that. Two of my boys had all of their teeth by 16 months, as well. Still say it's not possible for a 22 month old to be that animated, articulate and advanced enough to be "early reading." I'll quit now! :)

I have to disagree on the sippy - mine used sippies until they were well past 3 - for cleanliness! I don't like messes! lol. The speech is also not that of a 22 month old. I have a 21 month old son and he is advanced for his age and he is not "early reading" which is what Caylee is doing in...

ITA!! She is way too advanced - early reading, animation, etc - to be only 22 months! WAY! There is NO possible way! That is what sticks out to me.

OMG...LOL! I did hear him say that but did not "catch" it until now! That is just too much. That's it, I've definitely decided that no one is home!! (In George's head that is) JMO!

Well, we know that isn't accurate cause she wasn't working! But, maybe she didn't know the how and when? Shoot - maybe she was just thinking she'd be out late partying and didn't know/care where she was going to leave Caylee. Or...maybe she had "plans" already?:eek:

Yep! I think that's the reason, as well.

yep, far as I know. Actually, even in the beginning, when the media started on this story, it was said that a neighbor had stole them but Casey had done it in the past. Just recently changed that story to create a new timeline, IMO.

Which is also where the pavers are!!! Hmmmm.....

I believe the 17th.

Very disgusting. She could have backed in because the neighbor was in the yard and she was in the trunk? Maybe she never tried to bury her in the backyard but buried evidence thus the hits from the dogs? Maybe Caylee was taken somewhere else? just a thought...

OR puts her in the trunk overnight!?

I've never understood how she didn't know for sure when she needed to be at her imaginary job that day! 4 hours?! Seriously... Not like she didn't have time to figure it out to be sure. Problem is, she didn't have any job that she went to that day to confirm the time! She obviously couldn't...

Good point. What did you find? Too tired to read it myself! :) I find that interesting - as if they had discussed the timeline beforehand?!

Could very well have happened that way. But why in the world involve the neighbor to begin with when you can (obviously) just break into mommy & daddy's shed without any repercussions?

Another thing I wondered is since she broke into the shed to steal the gas cans on 6/22 or so, couldn't she just as easily broken into the shed to use the shovel on 6/17 or whatever day it is that she needed it so badly? I mean, not like she couldn't lie her way out of it if her parents...

I think he did have a new job but he was going to work, somewhere, on 6/16 and again on 6/24...according to him in his recent interviews.

That was before the revised timeline was announced on Greta! Casey & Caylee were last seen by George on 6/16 at 12:50, right before he went to work... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,398490,00.html?sPage=fnc/ontherecord/caylee