I agree it is complicated and varies by state. It is obviously a tool used in other cases.
This was the answer I received when I asked if it was a possibility with THIS case. I was told no. It's a chain of custody issue.
I agree with you. I think it should be utilized as a tool. I'm just sharing what I was told by LE in IN when I questioned why it had not been used in this case.
There are strict rules and laws regarding the chain of custody for evidence.
I'm assuming the police can't turn the DNA over to a geneology company. I will look into it further.
I don't have clarification on that. I was just told they have been tight-lipped since going. I asked what could take 2 months to rule him out and was told he was incarcerated, so they could take their time.
I ASSUMED someone was still there. This may be an incorrect asumption.
Sent from my...
Woops, I think you are referring to Grandpa (Mike.) Libby lived with her grandparents and they were the ones on the show.
It is odd how her parents are completely missing from all of this.
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
Why would they still be in CO if he isn't a main POI. Word from the local force is LE has been tighted lipped, even within the force, since arriving in CO.
And if this is is their man, he's already behind bars, so where is the hurry to move forward publicly?
Maybe they want to do this to the...
She may have had distinctive shoes on. She may not have been fully clothed. While it is common sense, two missing and two found, they still needed to be IDed.
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.