Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. E

    Post sentencing discussion

    Sarcasm is used against OPs version repeatedly on this forum. I didn't realise it was offensive?
  2. E

    Post sentencing discussion

    This guy is clearly a criminal mastermind. Able to act distraught and at the same time deliberately stage the crime scene just minutes after murdering his gf. Then shortly after create a bail statement with a plausible defence that is (at least broadly) consistent with the evidence in the house...
  3. E

    Post sentencing discussion

    I can't speak for others, but the reasons I do not post anymore are that everytime someone challenged the conventional (on this forum at least) way of thinking, we were labelled "pistorians" who were seduced by OP's fame and were, putting it bluntly, stupid and naive. We were told that no...
  4. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #58 - 14.17.10, Day 47 ~ sentencing~

    Very interesting - I read that silence differently - as in, he was thinking to himself - 'why didn't she say anything' - and overcome by the moment. Something that interests me - and I'd be interested to hear from others - is where OP was actually standing when he shot. I'd always assumed that...
  5. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #58 - 14.17.10, Day 47 ~ sentencing~

    But OP has been crying throughout the trial. He was crying and vomiting when the post mortum photos were shown. I don't understand why those tears were "fake" but these tears are genuine...?
  6. E

    Discussion between the verdict and sentencing

    Do you think he did a google search for possible defences after he shot her. Would explain the delay between the shots and calling for help...?
  7. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #53 - 14.12.9, Day 42 ~ final verdict~

    No I didn't. I thought he was guilty of murder.
  8. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #53 - 14.12.9, Day 42 ~ final verdict~

    I suppose we'll now see if all those conspiracy theories about escape to mosambique etc come true...
  9. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Does anyone have an ideas about the sudden adjournment, following a v brief bit after lunch (and after seeing Nel and Roux in chambers). All v. odd.
  10. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Let's just clear something up here. During a trial a judge will hear inconsistent evidence. The Defence case and the Prosecution case are inconsistent with each other. Heck, even the prosecution evidence, and defence evidence is internally inconsistent. The Judge had to pick one version to...
  11. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Completely agree - stood out as a clear error of law
  12. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    I'm curious - are you saying that someone has actually bribed Masipa. Or just that she was intimidated by OP's money. What do you mean "money talks"?
  13. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Look - no point arguing about this. The threads are there to see. You only need to read them to see that people on this forum were not complaining about Masipa's competence en masse like they are now. I am prepared to enter into sensible debate - but it is clear from your posts that you have...
  14. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    What makes you think I didn't read those threads at the time. They are there for everyone to see. They are not made up with post after post of people questioning her competence. Maybe one or two posts - but your counter-factual account of what happened is bizarre to say the least.
  15. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    No. People said she was being sympathetic in order to appeal-proof her verdict. No one said she was being sympathetic because she lacked competence. Anyway, one can be a sympathetic yet competent judge. I knew this would happen - people questioning Masipa's competence just because they didn't...
  16. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    People see what they want to see. No doubt if OP had been found guilty you would have still questioned her competence. :laughing:
  17. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Maybe because we will go straight onto sentencing tomorrow - in chambers, Masipa warned Roux that CH would be likely so OP/counsel could prepare for sentencing tomorrow? Just a guess
  18. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Not as many as are now. Basically the last month on this forum has been people labelling "pistorians" as being weak minded people seduced by OP's celebrity and gleefully anticipating Maspita cutting him down to size. That hasn't happened and so she is no being labelled as weak herself.
  19. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Yes, she wasn't getting it - because the prosecution case was so hopeless. Nel made a big mistake focussing his case on OP intending to kill Reeva. He could have got evenualis had it been accepted that OP knew it was an intruder, but still intended to kill. I think this got lost in the...
  20. E

    Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

    Sorry, what? No-one questioned this judge during the trial. People here were gleeful thinking of how this tough, fair judge would come down hard on OP. Now she hasn't suddenly she has been bought, or is biased? Please...

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
2,279
Total visitors
2,374

Forum statistics

Threads
599,867
Messages
18,100,468
Members
230,942
Latest member
Patturelli
Back
Top