They had two helicopters today hovering over the search area(I live in the area). There is something to make them believe she is down there to put all those resources in the search.
Juror 2, really? You thought she was guilty and you were the last holdout. In the end, no one could determine who was the caregiver that day, so not guilty.
NEWSFLASH!! Casey Anthony was, under the law, her parent. She alone was responsible for her child's welfare.
Instead of patting...
Could HJP sentence include restitution to the state?
I know that in the balloon boy case, the father was ordered to pay for the cost of the search. Shouldn't ICA be ordered to do the same?
Didn't the balloon boy's father have to repay the authorities for their false search. Wasn't it part of his sentence?
I truly believe he has a good case, as well as every single one of his searchers.
Think about it, a jury in Orlando on a civil case against ICA, wanting at least some...
George's very candid FBI taped interview where he is clearly struggling
She was jealous of Caylee, they didn't hear about that much
Tony not wanting kids or only a boy. Tony didn't think his apartment was a good environment for Caylee.
The fight
The stealing
They did hear...
Before we heard his interview, my husband said he suspected someone strong armed them, one of the jurors influenced the rest.
I suspect this one.
They absolutely discussed this before yesterday.
LKB said something last night about the defense filing a motion this morning that had something to do with witness intimidation by the DOD in regard to Dr. Rodriguez's testimony. I suspect this may be the issue today.
The state has convinced me beyond a reasonable doubt.
31 days (or never if it was up to Casey)
bagged and dumped
dead body in trunk
Blockbuster tape
Casey making plans for future without restrictions
These five things alone do it for me.
I don't even need the scientific evidence...
IMHO, there is absolutely no way that JB will not put on a defense. He seems to enjoy the grandstanding.
Cheney just wanted to get this instruction in one more time. Remember, he also has his own ideas for the jury instructions at the end of the trial.
I have been wondering, obviously the defense wants to put RC on the stand to try and prove an affair, etc.
Can the SA object due to relavance. RC has absolutely nothing to due with the case, and anything she was told seems to be heresay.
Can the DT get her testimony in somehow??
I'm confused, wasn't it the defense that wanted to bring in this study in the first place? I seem to remember arguments during jury selection, with the DT saying this study was very important, and the state saying the experiment wasn't even complete
She won't testify.
If you hear the opening arguments, Jose states that when she is 13, she "COULD" put the object in her mouth and then go to school.
IMHO, the word could means they have no intention on putting her on the stand.
It is not going to happen.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.