Search results

I think you're giving the employees at Kilroy's a little too much credit. "Bar management" did not let them in - the bouncers did. It's a raucous college bar and these guys see wasted young people as long as their eyes are open on the job. If they didn't let drunk people in, they'd probably be...

welcome! Welcome! Welcome! And well said!

With all due respect to you and the BPD, I think your response would be more accurate if phrased like this: They originally believed it circled the block, but now they believe it didn't. The distinction is you are assuming that they made a BIG mistake the first time, and yet at the same...

This may be a little far out but ... That barn that caught fire was connected to some trucking company, and the son of the owner goes to/went to Ivy tech. Let's assume for a minute that LS did end up there. Is it so crazy to imagine that a trucking business has two or more of the same model of...

Can someone please remind me how these two people are connected, in general? I get that ZO is prob the guy that punched CR. And that AB is potentially maybe but not necessarily the 3:38 mystery man ... But how are they connected to each other and to the rest of this group? Who ARE they...

Jupiter was trying to say that the attorney tried to prepare JR - with a bunch of BS - for how to respond to the media. JR botched the BS response anyway, and now the attorney is probably mad at him. Seems pretty obvious to me.

Ok, got it. So the official timeline is she left Kilroy's at 2:30am and got to Smallwood at 2:42am. You're saying this witness sighting could have happened at 2:38am? Or just that she was seen at 2:38am on camera, but not necessarily in the scenario described by the witness?

Yes but this isn't a Laci Peterson after-she's-gone-missing sighting or the Ghost of Natalee Holloway. This is a witness that spoke with Tony Gatto, at length, on the record (albeit anonymous), who Tony has vouched for incessantly. She spoke of LS's extremely impaired condition before it...

:waitasec: Eh, I doubt it. They were probably just on drugs, by choice.

Maybe but this doesn't sound quite discredit it either: “What I’m here to tell you is that we have reviewed the video, not only the timeline that we have been using, ... and where [LS] does in fact appear ... she does appear in that video with someone that is already known to investigators...

IDK, because he's not the brightest crayon in the box and spoke with HT (who this info originally came from) before he purchased a shiny attorney? I'm not saying this is the theory I believe in, just that it's a POV to consider because it could raise more questions, get brains thinking...

Her making it to that apartment is unverified. And he would have a reason to lie and say that she made it to his apartment and left safely if the alternative was that he gave her/did more drugs with her until she OD'd and then got rid of the body.

ALL THEORY/DEVIL'S ADVOCATE STUFF: Maybe an inebriated CR went to bed, blackout drunk/high. And maybe MB saw LS out of their apt just like he said. Maybe LS did ask MB if he wanted to "party". So LS tells MB that she is going to JR's, and MB takes her word for it. But she never makes it to...

Posted 1 hour ago: "War of Words between Lauren Spierer's mom and a person of interest. Was [JR] lying on camera? A Fox 59 exclusive tonight at 4 & 5" Via: http://twitter.com/#!/AnneFOX59

I replied to her tweet and brought up that she first reported that CS said nothing and asked which is it. Stay tuned ...

It couldn't have been a response because it was written long before he made that statement.

Did anyone see the NewsOnLaurenS Twitter feed today? The following tweet was posted: "Sending you love and strength [insert BW Twitter handle] as you face these days back trying to #FindLauren. Continue to handle it w/courage & grace. xo" Perhaps BW is the one friend who is coming forward. I...

IMO "privately" just means "not publicly" and "in my own way, however I define it". So he speaks to them not through the mass media, and by speaks he means he has submitted a prepared statement and a [prepared] polygraph. Just what I take from that.

Really, really like that analysis. Or ANY analysis that points to "this clue is a message to SOMEONE assering him/her that the 12:16am text is significant." This may also be a stretch but ... what if there is evidence/proof/witness testimony of someone else using her phone AFTER 12:16am? Like...

If this is a "clue", here is me trying to decode it: You should always have YOUR cell phone with you. Lauren last used HER [as in, possessive - Lauren last used the cell phone that belonged to her] at 12:16am. If she last used her cell phone at 12:16am, then 12:16am is the last worthy...