mrssmith23
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2013
- Messages
- 1,281
- Reaction score
- 10
Supplying contestants to a *advertiser censored* fight constitutes participating in cockfighting, IMO. No one has that many roosters (and no hens) without being involved in fighting them. A full fledged chicken and egg operation needs relatively few roosters. Roosters get around.
I'm fully satisfied the Rhodens were involved in cockfighting but have seen no evidence it lead to their murders. I also doubt inheritance is relevant. The cars, weed, and dogs are more likely reasons. I still maintain the motive was based on a love interest or child custody.
Agree to disagree. Sure, supplying the roosters can be considered "participating" but that doesn't mean they were physically there participating. People COULD have that many roosters if they were breeding and selling. Maybe they would sell them by the bulk, or set up at flea markets and sell them, like many people do. You don't just bring a few roosters. You also wouldn't be bringing a bunch of roosters to a fight. Unless you were selling them.
Not sure what you are talking about with inheritance. Never said anything about it.
We also have NO confirmation they were fighting dogs. Some people just have a lot of dogs. Some of their dogs were hunting dogs. Some guard dogs. Some family companions.
I don't see it likely being related to custody or a love interest. JMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk