petedavo.au
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2016
- Messages
- 2,314
- Reaction score
- 1,024
The scenario I described earlier with the Kimono doesn't need anyone on the database already.Exactly!
And was there a relative on the database at all?
............................................
Posts my opinion unless source included. All my original text/images are my personal copyright and can't be reproduced outside of WebSleuths without my permission.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]
If two samples off the kimono were a familial match, and one of them matched other samples from the other crime scenes. Then the familial matching sample on the Kimono must've been the person who hung it on the clothesline. Then all they need to know is who reported it missing. No pre existing database entry required. They've got their man being a sibling or offspring of the person that hung the Kimono on the clothesline. Simple.
That is why I'm going to guess: that the accused stole the Kimono off his own folks clothesline and this explains why he was arrested only after that item was tested.
IMO
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk