Nova
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 19,648
- Reaction score
- 4,640
maybe indisputable evidence was the wrong phrasing. But she is going to be convinced by the evidence that it was self defense, or she is going to be convinced that it was not....and even if there is not indisputable evidence it will have to go to trial, but I don't believe that it is going to be, well, we just don't know for sure so we aren't going to do anything. I firmly believe that there will be a preponderance of evidence one way or the other. IMO JMHO and stuff.
As I said above, I believe "probable cause" ("preponderance of evidence" is a similar, but civil burden) is enough to charge, but I think the DA has to believe she has proof beyond a reasonable doubt to actually go to trial. Charges get dismissed all the time because DAs can't meet this burden.