LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
DE LA RIONDA: But you still have, is it not true, a witness who describes someone chasing another person from the area where they ended up... in other words, from where, near where Mr. Martin lived to the area where the murder happened?
====================================================
so the state contends that TM was at his home and was chased away from his home by GZ?
It sounds like what they are saying is what Papa stated earlier with his theory that GZ continued down the street on Retreat View to the break in the houses and found TM at the point in TM's conversation where the GF stated TM said to her that GZ found him. TM asks why are you following me, GZ asks what are you doing here and she hears a scuffle/encounter and the phone goes dead. That puts GZ way off of that cut through path and if the witness saw shadows and their condo is near that break in the homes it means GZ chased TM back down the path he had just traveled until he caught up with him and they both went down at the spot where TM was shot. That is what that could mean. We do not know where this witness lives. But if it is further down the path from where TM's body ended up there is no way it was the boy with the dog because he was up the other end. jmo