I am iffy on many of LP's theories but I was pondering this one today about LE listening to/overhearing a privileged conversation and learning where the body was. Of course we have no proof and it does seem far-fetched that they would tell someone to tell her boyfriend about it...
BUT... Caylee was missing... what if they listened in and heard where the
live Caylee was... ? What if they heard the name of some drug dealer or old friend or the nanny's real name... and they could go and get her, alive... 100% of my heart would have wanted them to ACT on that information, privileged or not... you know? I think it would be very difficult to rationalize
not listening when there is potentially a life, a child's life, in danger.
LE has said they tapped the phones, bugged the house, and sent people out wearing a wire, and my head knows that they would have listened to every word she and her family and many of her friends said, in jail and out, with the one single exception being her privileged conversations with her counsel. And I figure they tape those too, in fact IIRC when they thing went down with JB possibly having an inappropriate relationship I thought they revealed they taped them with the sound off? Then I started thinking, technical mishaps happen every day, and it might just take one time where the sound was inadvertently left on...
It may be ridiculous, I don't know. But it did make me think that it would be incredibly easy for LE to overhear this, if it was said. And, although illegal, it is morally defensible, IMO.
And... for JB to accuse them of overhearing where the body was and passing it along, he would have to admit that he and ICA were
discussing where the body was. So he accuses LE of breaking attorney/client privilege and his accusation is basically the equivalent of a confession from ICA. I don't think it is a road he (or any other defense team) is likely to go down.
Just got me thinking... sometimes LP's theories do that to me.
I need to go learn some more about this privilege, I think.