You can't acquit!
I must admit this was a mixed bag for me. While LK did seem less soft in some of the questions, he kept asking why they wouldn't visit KC over and over, which is completely at the bottom of what us evil, apparently childless, "bloggers" want to know. The man had THOUSANDS of great questions people sent in all day long and it is pretty pathetic that he harped on that small point to the exclusion of others, particularly those that had to do with them picking up the car, not mentioning it in their initial police reports, and cleaning what was evidently a crime scene. I think their after the fact insistence on claiming the smell was anything but decomp is also a huge CYA for them so it makes them look innocent of obstruction or of being accessories.
The good part was that the nanosecond something more substantive was asked, CA's real personality leaked out of every facial orifice. The woman has almost no impulse control with her temper and it's easy to see to whom she may have bequeathed that little personality trait. GA had a look on his face like a child in a messy diaper at times, particularly when CA talked about her "faith" getting her through and when she sanctimoniously indicated why she could not go through with her thoughts of suicide. He kept cutting looks to his left at CA like she was an IED about ready to blow.
While I could tolerate all that the most unforgivable malarky was that foundation business. They will forever be known as the people who tried to twist a murdered child case into a missing child case (and financially profit from the exposure), and I cannot think that OCSO or another first-response agency would be anything less than horrified to hand a Caylee bear out to the family of a missing child, just by what it would imply. Foundations are set up to do good in the name of a deceased person, not to rub in their name and demise to the suffering. There is apparently no end to their lack of taste.
