2010.03.18 KC's indigency hearing #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
:banghead: Yes, I read it a little bit ago and could not believe that this was not brought up in todays hearing. Is it not a conflict of interest if Baez is the one that got paid for Caylee's pics/videos?


Okay somewhere on this thread I thought I read where someone posted Hornsby saying it would be a conflict of interest. I am confused now for sure. I'll go back and look for that post.
 
Mr. Baez seems to have a very poor understanding of what just happened today. All hell broke loose and he thinks he emerged victorious. He may be in very serious trouble with the bar over the ABC deal that he brokered. I have to think of a new theme song for him but I know it will have the words bye bye in it.

ABC says the picture deal was brokered BY BAEZ, not Casey.


"I asked ABC News if the deal was done with Casey Anthony.

The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added."

www.orlandosentinel.com


Na na na na, na na na na
Hey hey hey, goodbye
Na na na na, na na na na
Hey hey hey, goodbye
 
Mr. Baez seems to have a very poor understanding of what just happened today. All hell broke loose and he thinks he emerged victorious. He may be in very serious trouble with the bar over the ABC deal that he brokered. I have to think of a new theme song for him but I know it will have the words bye bye in it.

ABC says the picture deal was brokered BY BAEZ, not Casey.


"I asked ABC News if the deal was done with Casey Anthony.

The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added."

www.orlandosentinel.com

That is what I'm screamin'!!!

Think about it -

1) ABC threw Baez under the bus

2) Baez throws Macaluso under the bus, but little does he realize he was hanging onto his pants leg and was dragged right with him...

then,

3) Casey throws Baez a curve ball by passing notes...


AND I REALLY DON'T THINK HE GETS THE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS OF ALL OF THIS!!!
 
And why did they take so long today in the back room to figure out what they were going to testify to about where the funds came from and how they were spent? The truth shouldn't be that hard to figure out.
You would think in a case regarding money and being indigent the defense would have been prepared with itemized expenditures. But nooooo...........
 
"Snip" Baez interview after hearing: http://www.wftv.com/video/22878495/index.html
Baez claims that ABC fee's were for licensing photos. When asked if taxes were paid on the money he did not want to answer about his clients finances. I really would like to know who the several owners of copyrighted content are.

The article reads ABC said the picture deal was brokered BY BAEZ, not Casey.

The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added."
<snipped> http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/ent...y+(TV+Guy)


I wonder if BS or RH will enlighten us on this. I thought something like this would throw Baez off the case? :waitasec:

Legal Analyst Bill Sheaffer on Casey Anthony Case
Submit Questions For Bill To Answer


"Snip" http://www.wftv.com/caseyanthonyblog/index.html
 
Why the heck do they say In Camera?

Why not say Off Camera.

Exactly - reminds me of my first court case when I was very young and the Judge told me I could step down - which was very confusing since I was already sitting/standing on the same level as everyone else.:waitasec:
 
Can someone please post a link so those of us that missed the hearing can watch it now.. Please and thank you.

CASEY ARRIVES: See Images
http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/22876349/detail.html

RAW VIDEO: Casey Anthony Walks Into Court 0:39
http://www.wftv.com/video/22876354/index.html

INDIGENCY HEARING: Part 1
http://www.wftv.com/video/22876686/index.html

INDIGENCY HEARING: Part 2

http://www.wftv.com/video/22877854/index.html

INDIGENCY HEARING: See Images

http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/22876532/detail.html


Angel Who Cares has all the updates here as well

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=67819
 
Because that is exactly the type of person they need....IMO, they have bungled this case badly since the beginning. They need someone of his caliber and reputation to try and regain some credibility. Plus, its a win win for Mr. Mason. He can afford to do this pro-bono for his time...especially if the costs are to be paid by JAC.

What floored me about adding on another lawyer, was that it happened at the indigency hearing. Are they allowed to keep adding on lawyers, even when the state is paying for costs? And/or was the strategy to slip him in before JS approved the indigency request?
 
"Snip" Baez interview after hearing: http://www.wftv.com/video/22878495/index.html
Baez claims that ABC fee's were for licensing photos. When asked if taxes were paid on the money he did not want to answer about his clients finances. I really would like to know who the several owners of copyrighted content are.

Respectfully snipped.

BBM

Besides KC, the only other owners would be Cindy and George. Which leads us back to the question. What happened to the rest of the money?
 
Does anyone else remember Mr. Mason sayint the the Public Defender's Office could not afford a case like this. He mentioned someones name from the Public Defender's Office and they agreed. My questions would be, how are other death penalty cases tried if not for the Public Defender's Office as most charged with a DP crime can not afford their own attornies?
 
Who went to get Caylee's photos/video's copyrighted??

Dont' you pay a fee for that???
 
Mr. Baez seems to have a very poor understanding of what just happened today. All hell broke loose and he thinks he emerged victorious. He may be in very serious trouble with the bar over the ABC deal that he brokered. I have to think of a new theme song for him but I know it will have the words bye bye in it.

ABC says the picture deal was brokered BY BAEZ, not Casey.


"I asked ABC News if the deal was done with Casey Anthony.

The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added."

www.orlandosentinel.com

Wow. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't RH say that this would be an ethics violation?

So, what are we looking at here? Possible ethics violation for JB? Possible perjury by JB (his testimony today in court)? And how about GA and CA. I would think that the other "owners of copyrighted content" would almost certainly be them. Oh no, couldn't be right? They testified in their depos that they had received no money except for the 48 Hours show. But then again, maybe they "donated" their share to to the defense.

Whole crowd makes me absolutely sick! And to think it's no where near over yet. What else!
 
When the Camera was focused on THE GIGGLE GIRLS they really wanted to make sure we couldn't hear them.ONE TWISTED the long mic,KC HELD THE BUTTON DOWN(TOO BAD IT DIDNT SHORT OUT WOULD A SAVED TAXPAYER)And VERSACCI ALMOST.I keep thinking about the 3 MONKEYS, The ones that dont SEE ,SPEAK OR HEAR EVIL.Otherwise how could they sit next to EVIL and LAUGH.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
1,856
Total visitors
1,981

Forum statistics

Threads
601,490
Messages
18,125,307
Members
231,069
Latest member
megamookie
Back
Top