salvarenga
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 2,201
- Reaction score
- -174
Disney owns ABC, so...........
Disney has been paying KC's defense.
As a parent this makes me sick!
Disney owns ABC, so...........
Disney has been paying KC's defense.
:banghead: Yes, I read it a little bit ago and could not believe that this was not brought up in todays hearing. Is it not a conflict of interest if Baez is the one that got paid for Caylee's pics/videos?
Mr. Baez seems to have a very poor understanding of what just happened today. All hell broke loose and he thinks he emerged victorious. He may be in very serious trouble with the bar over the ABC deal that he brokered. I have to think of a new theme song for him but I know it will have the words bye bye in it.
ABC says the picture deal was brokered BY BAEZ, not Casey.
"I asked ABC News if the deal was done with Casey Anthony.
The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added."
www.orlandosentinel.com
Mr. Baez seems to have a very poor understanding of what just happened today. All hell broke loose and he thinks he emerged victorious. He may be in very serious trouble with the bar over the ABC deal that he brokered. I have to think of a new theme song for him but I know it will have the words bye bye in it.
ABC says the picture deal was brokered BY BAEZ, not Casey.
"I asked ABC News if the deal was done with Casey Anthony.
The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added."
www.orlandosentinel.com
Why the heck do they say In Camera?
Why not say Off Camera.
You would think in a case regarding money and being indigent the defense would have been prepared with itemized expenditures. But nooooo...........And why did they take so long today in the back room to figure out what they were going to testify to about where the funds came from and how they were spent? The truth shouldn't be that hard to figure out.
Why the heck do they say In Camera?
Why not say Off Camera.
Can someone please post a link so those of us that missed the hearing can watch it now.. Please and thank you.
Angel Who Cares has all the updates here as well
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=67819
Those that are uneducated...who is this new lawyer talking about?
Because that is exactly the type of person they need....IMO, they have bungled this case badly since the beginning. They need someone of his caliber and reputation to try and regain some credibility. Plus, its a win win for Mr. Mason. He can afford to do this pro-bono for his time...especially if the costs are to be paid by JAC.
"Snip" Baez interview after hearing: http://www.wftv.com/video/22878495/index.html
Baez claims that ABC fee's were for licensing photos. When asked if taxes were paid on the money he did not want to answer about his clients finances. I really would like to know who the several owners of copyrighted content are.
Respectfully snipped.
BBM
Besides KC, the only other owners would be Cindy and George. Which leads us back to the question. What happened to the rest of the money?
Mr. Baez seems to have a very poor understanding of what just happened today. All hell broke loose and he thinks he emerged victorious. He may be in very serious trouble with the bar over the ABC deal that he brokered. I have to think of a new theme song for him but I know it will have the words bye bye in it.
ABC says the picture deal was brokered BY BAEZ, not Casey.
"I asked ABC News if the deal was done with Casey Anthony.
The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added."
www.orlandosentinel.com
Na na na na, na na na na
Hey hey hey, goodbye
Na na na na, na na na na
Hey hey hey, goodbye