whiteangora
I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 5,748
- Reaction score
- -2
I was annoyed by the introduction to the video, well over 2 minutes before it even started.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes I watched that video. I am not sure why he went into the woods on the other end of suburban other than to mislead people about the steepness of the grade. He showed water several times on the way to the site, but once to his opinion of the site location, there was no water. He was totally confused as to where Rk entered the woods. I noted the spot he pointed out that he said was the location of the skull, you could see clearly from the street. I appreciate his effort to give us a view of the current crime scene, but I really wish he would have stuck to the facts and not film a complete different location to find water and grade steepness. MOO
bbm.
When you say "this blog" are you talking about Websleuths?
What date was that posted? TIA
The comment was in Dave's blog. The comment is dated today's date.
Lona1 // April 10, 2010 at 12:14 pm
It certainly would be good news if correct.
So funny. I just drove by yesterday and noted that there is standing water, and we havent really had all that much rain.
And to make it more interesting, quote KC "I left her with ZFG between 9 and 1."
F. (first name sounds similar to Fernandez) Gonzales @ 4701 Hopespring
Zenaida A. @ 4709 Hopespring
Sorry that is no coinky dink. Nope, never get me to believe it. jmo
Yes I watched that video. I am not sure why he went into the woods on the other end of suburban other than to mislead people about the steepness of the grade. He showed water several times on the way to the site, but once to his opinion of the site location, there was no water. He was totally confused as to where Rk entered the woods. I noted the spot he pointed out that he said was the location of the skull, you could see clearly from the street. I appreciate his effort to give us a view of the current crime scene, but I really wish he would have stuck to the facts and not film a complete different location to find water and grade steepness. MOO
The comment was in Dave's blog. The comment is dated today's date.
Lona1 // April 10, 2010 at 12:14 pm
It certainly would be good news if correct.
Thanks Marinade Dave. But for viewers who have not been to the site or who are new to the case, be aware that the deep area Dave shows across from the school is not the spot where Caylee was found. You can see the site where Caylee's remains were found a little ways down the road around the 7:20-7:30 mark in the video. Yes, it was near the street, in a much shallower/more level area than the area shown at the beginning of the video. There is only a gentle slope away from the road. The water depth in the area where Caylee's skull and most of her remains were found, according to Dr. Jawitz's water level study (see resources / official documents) was up to 6 inches of water at its highest time, which was during a couple weeks in August '08 IIRC.) There was the usual leafy, viny ground cover and the curtains of vines hanging down, etc. She wasn't far into the treeline. So yes, foliage on the ground and hanging vines, and for a short time up to 6 inches of water on the ground around her, but not far into the foliage and not in a deep area with more than 6 inches of standing water at any time IIRC.
Thanks for the video
Thanks Marinade Dave. But for viewers who have not been to the site or who are new to the case, be aware that the deep area Dave shows across from the school is not the spot where Caylee was found. You can see the site where Caylee's remains were found a little ways down the road around the 7:20-7:30 mark in the video. Yes, it was near the street, in a much shallower/more level area than the area shown at the beginning of the video. There is only a gentle slope away from the road. The water depth in the area where Caylee's skull and most of her remains were found, according to Dr. Jawitz's water level study (see resources / official documents) was up to 6 inches of water at its highest time, which was during a couple weeks in August '08 IIRC.) There was the usual leafy, viny ground cover and the curtains of vines hanging down, etc. She wasn't far into the treeline. So yes, foliage on the ground and hanging vines, and for a short time up to 6 inches of water on the ground around her, but not far into the foliage and not in a deep area with more than 6 inches of standing water at any time IIRC.
Thanks for the video
Unfortunately Dr. Jawitz's water calculations were done by averaging the rainfall over a number of prior years, so his results are not accurate for that year but a median figure for a number of them. I believe you will hear the SA ask him to amend those stats.
Also fallen trees and branches on the ground. She was placed near a fallen tree. The person who deposited her remains didn't go far into difficult terrain, they just went a short distance inside the treeline/hanging vines etc, and that's where her remains were placed next to a log. But yes, this kind of terrain can be all bumpy with roots, vines, shrub palmetto type plants, fallen logs, some areas with water, etc. Thanks to all the searchers who searched everywhere in Orlando through all kinds of terrain.
And those divers who went into the Econ River.
p.s. I think maybe DC's (private investigator's) videos give an idea what the area looked like, don't they (I'm trying to remember), if anyone wants to see what the foliage and terrain was like before it was cleared IIRC. But Dave's video is interesting because you can see the walk along Suburban from the school down toward Hopespring to the remains site, the lay of the whole area, etc
Sorry Logical Girl and Zsa Zsa, I hadn't read your posts while I was writing my second post. I was only talking about the spot where Caylee's remains were found of course, not the spot where Tim Miller's ATV went into deep water and so on. I'm not discussing issues related to why searches were called off or any of that, that's not the topic of this thread.
I don't have any expertise to challenge Dr. Jawitz's report, I thought I remembered him addressing the water level post hurricane, both at Remains area A and at deeper areas nearby, but I will wait til trial to see how he explains the water levels. His report of the water not being higher than 6 inches at remains area A sounded reasonable to me having seen the ground at the site. Again, I'm not a water expert like he is, so I'll see how the facts are presented at trial.
The mattress comment was quite funny. I have my moments of being one who "tries to defend KC"....and even I laughed. I have a feeling it would be fun to have Marinade Dave over for dinnner. He cares about Caylee...and is he not mean spirited in any way. Maybe we'd marinade something.