strawberry
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 12,052
- Reaction score
- 2,741
Discussing a defense response to Stricklands order. They are complaining about an adversarial tone from Strickland. They make 23 points and are refuting things that Strickland said.
Did they mention while on the media that they are refuting the self aggrandizing (I love that word) media hound part? They have to have the last word, don't they? It's over, he's off, it's irrelevent, move along...