I think it is definately about appeal-But I also think it is JP's desire to get AL's argument on the record, specifically, and he will tailor his denial to address, specifically, why AL's argument does not show that the DP charge in this case is incompatible with the constitution (of Florida or the US).
My hope is that he will ultimately tell her that she has not convinced him that he should be quick to subvert the law of the people, that there is no recourse for her complaint within the courts. I believe JP respects that this 'high-brow' stuff is AL's passion...but he also has to weigh the question at hand-is the state violating KC's rights in bringing DP charges? If the state has followed the law, KC's sex will not be of issue, IMO.