Thinking upside down: :Banane13:
Whatever Terri did, LE & family are focusing on her like crazy, LE did a mass flyer to see who saw her and her truck, they received in excess of 250 responses to the flyer, but they haven't arrested her.
Terri told LE (her original story) that she left Kyron at school, in the hall, and left the school and went on her way about her day/errands.
And, LE has confirmed for us that Kyron & Terri were, indeed at school that morning. However, LE "can't comment" on what they know about Kyron and/or Terri leaving school that morning.
Why can't they comment? Because they're not sure? Because they know? Because they don't want anyone to know what they know - one way or another?
Would it be wrong to assume, that if they had evidence that Terri left school with Kyron, or even if they had evidence that Kyron was in her truck at a time after 8:45 (solicited videos, witnesses, etc.) - Terri would be arrested based on the fact that she told a very big fat lie about Kyron and denied taking him from school that morning - - and there's only one reason to tell such a lie...?
So, by thinking through this upside down and backwards, and knowing Terri is not arrested ... could this mean LE has confirmed Terri left, but they cannot confirm for certain that she left with Kyron? (Thus, no comment.)
Does this help at all?
(note to cluciano, I know goes against your theory on what "no comment" means, but stay with me!)
(Leaving the young friend T's timeline out of it for the moment.)
IMO, not being able to confirm that Kyron left with Terri - is their whole problem.
IMO Terri left and they have that confirmed. They just can't prove that she left with Kyron.
But! they can prove Terri lied about where she was and what she did that day.
Now, this may make no sense whatsoever. Please poke holes.
If this makes sense, maybe we'll turn the whole forum on it's head and solve this case faster. LOL.:Banane13: