My thought is that she was brought in front of the GJ based on the MFH. I'm pretty sure TH confided in DDS in some form or fashion that she was thinking, planning or did plan to hire a hitman.
http://www.aolnews.com/crime/article/arrest-could-come-soon-in-kyron-horman-case/19570143
"Grand jury testimony is not open to the public, so the exact details of what is going on inside the courtroom remain unknown, but Copus speculates the hearing will be centered more on an alleged murder-for-hire plot against Kaine Horman involving his wife.
"I suspect that what they have is not going to be an indictment on the young boy," Copus, now head of Copus Security Consultants in Atlanta, told AOL News. "Unless the police have developed some evidence that shows where the body is, what you have is a missing child, and there is no law that allows you to indict someone because someone is missing, unless you have evidence of foul play. They are most likely seeking an indictment in the alleged murder-for-hire plot."
The reason for that would be to put pressure on Terri Horman so she "shares any information she might have on the child's whereabouts," Copus said."
I looked up the MFT statute and it has the propensity to become a federal crime.
http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01107.htm
"The "murder-for-hire" statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1958, was enacted as part of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, Pub.L. 98-473, Ch. X, Part A (Oct. 12, 1984). Section 1958(a) provides:
Whoever travels in or causes another (including the intended victim) to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses or causes another (including the intended victim) to use the mail or any facility in interstate or foreign commerce, with intent that a murder be committed in violation of the laws of any State or the United States as consideration for the receipt of, or as consideration for a promise or agreement to pay anything of pecuniary value, or who conspires to do so [violates this statute].
Federal jurisdiction may be established in one of three ways: 1) by travel in interstate or foreign commerce; 2) by use of the mails; or 3) by use of any facility in interstate or foreign commerce.
The term "facility in interstate or foreign commerce" is defined to expressly include "means of transportation and communication." § 1958(b)(2). Congress intended to give the term "facility in interstate or foreign commerce" the same scope and breadth encompassed by the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952. S.Rep. 225 at 306 n.5."
Based on Copus' statement, combined with the GJ, DDS not testifying, and the fact that there has been no indication of Kyron's whereabouts, I'm afraid everything we have seen is centered around the MFH aspect of the case and not THE MAIN FOCUS HERE, which is KYRON!!
Grrr...so frustrating!