cyberborg
Seeking Justice for Victims
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 5,256
- Reaction score
- -3
LOVE IT! especially the "Dropping 300 pages of documentation into the court file cannot reasonably be interpreted to comply with this direction."
So, when Mason wrote in the Motion for Reconsideration, repeatedly, that the Defense had already "substantially complied" [by filing the 300 pages on Dec. 15th] with the Court's Order to provide 5 areas of information on the Defense Experts .... the Judge does NOT agree with Mason's assessment.
So ... the strategy to dump 300 pages of noise (resume documents) at the last minute to buy time and obfuscate didn't fly eh?
:waitasec: You can usually tell if there is 'volume' that it is lacking 'content' and thus the content that was actually ordered. Busted ... doh! :floorlaugh: