gardeness
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2010
- Messages
- 536
- Reaction score
- 0
sbmThis case breaks my heart, it's just so hard for me to come back to it. I want him home, or at least a little closure on where he is.
Me, too.
sbmThis case breaks my heart, it's just so hard for me to come back to it. I want him home, or at least a little closure on where he is.
Hi Pinktoes, I would agree with you except if she is psychotic as Pat Brown has intimated she could be, she might feel she did nothing wrong. Especially if someone else hid the body.
Then all the more reason to run off at the mouth. Alcohol is a disinhibitor for everyone.
I'm a recently retired clinical psychologist and I don't do diagnoses in absentia. That's why I can't draw conclusions from notions about what sort of mental disorder someone I've never even met may have. Further complication for me is that I'd want to verify the sources of all her reported behavior. And interview her family and friends to see her behavior in an interrelated context.
But that's just how a clinician works.
She's handing out Halloween candy? In Feb.??
I'm also hoping that her lawyer gets fed up with her antics, and drops her as a client..
A clinician is not the same thing as an expert witness testifying at trial. An expert witness would not have the same breadth nor depth of opportunity as a clinician would. For instance, generally an expert witness (of any professional or technical stripe) only has the opportunity to interview the subject. That's old school. It is well understood now that an individual's behavior happens within the context of their family, school/workplace, friends and community. And that's the context within which the individual is understood, and a "label" applied.
And that's why an expert witness' testimony is rarely as reliable, or as consistent from expert to expert, as is a clinician's. Well understood that it's influenced by who's signing the check.
Add to that, that Pat Brown has never even interviewed Terri ONCE, as an expert witness would, and I say Pat Brown's opinion is no better than yours--or mine.
Just trying to clear away some distractions, like opinions that should not really be the basis for any judgments in this situation.
I'm also hoping that her lawyer gets fed up with her antics, and drops her as a client..
But what antics? I've not heard of any actual, specific sightings of TH doing anything at all, anywhere.
Do you think that you or I or any Internet sleuther have followed Terri's "sightings", movements, and activities to the extent a grieving Mother who believes Terri responsible has done?
And a grieving Mother...married to LE?
I can't say I have been that vigilant. Nor would I claim to have a grieving Mother's commitment to the task.
A clinician is not the same thing as an expert witness testifying at trial. An expert witness would not have the same breadth nor depth of opportunity as a clinician would. For instance, generally an expert witness (of any professional or technical stripe) only has the opportunity to interview the subject. That's old school. It is well understood now that an individual's behavior happens within the context of their family, school/workplace, friends and community. And that's the context within which the individual is understood, and a "label" applied.
And that's why an expert witness' testimony is rarely as reliable, or as consistent from expert to expert, as is a clinician's. Well understood that it's influenced by who's signing the check.
Add to that, that Pat Brown has never even interviewed Terri ONCE, as an expert witness would, and I say Pat Brown's opinion is no better than yours--or mine.
Just trying to clear away some distractions, like opinions that should not really be the basis for any judgments in this situation.
A clinician is not the same thing as an expert witness testifying at trial. An expert witness would not have the same breadth nor depth of opportunity as a clinician would. For instance, generally an expert witness (of any professional or technical stripe) only has the opportunity to interview the subject. That's old school. It is well understood now that an individual's behavior happens within the context of their family, school/workplace, friends and community. And that's the context within which the individual is understood, and a "label" applied.
And that's why an expert witness' testimony is rarely as reliable, or as consistent from expert to expert, as is a clinician's. Well understood that it's influenced by who's signing the check.
Add to that, that Pat Brown has never even interviewed Terri ONCE, as an expert witness would, and I say Pat Brown's opinion is no better than yours--or mine.
Just trying to clear away some distractions, like opinions that should not really be the basis for any judgments in this situation.
I keep it simple and trust my gut instincts, I go by the if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck theory, I keep it real.
If I were completely innocent of disappearing my stepson, I would realize how inappropriate it is to be running around to bars while other adults in the family grieve, do pressers, and organize groups.
If I were dependent on my parents for a roof over my head and food, I would not disrespect them by spending money at bars and making a show of entertaining myself. Sure, everyone needs a little entertainment. There are ways of seeing to that within the privacy of the home out of respect for one's loved ones--and demonstrating some grasp of what one has put other people through.
I don't know if you can "diagnose" anything from Terri's behavior, but any context I can see it in says "selfishness" to me.