2011.04.06 Frye Hearing Thread

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Baez is dissing the State, again.......
 
HHJP: says will look at ruling and at testimony of said dr. from other cases where he has testified.

JB: you have two issues. what were the specific facts in that case. in this case it was only one hair. only one showed decomp. now, that may be completely different set of facts than in the ny case. it was not just one piece of hair. also, the state in a "clever move" is saying the witness was hired by the defense.

HHJP: i don't care.

JB: we can't ignore the pink elephant in the room

HHJP: I don't see pink elephants. (personal note: :luv: )
 
JB:

"a clever move?????????????"
(by the prosecution)
 
When logic fails accuse the prosecutor


HHJP: I don't see Pink Elephants Baez


Novice Seeker
 
Quote of the day from your honor -- "I don't see pink elephants."
 
OMG! JAB is insulting HHJP's integrity regarding his ability to "see" the entire picture WITHOUT pink elephants that JAB MUST point out!:banghead::banghead:
 
I hope Bill Sheaffer is there today to tell us exactly what is going on here!
 
So to get this straight.....the defense originally retained Patreco as an expert. Chose not to use him and now they object to his comments in the New York case??

Looks like they tried to pull an AL trick. Retain them so the other side can't. Am I off here??

JB was expert hoarding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
187
Guests online
3,338
Total visitors
3,525

Forum statistics

Threads
604,604
Messages
18,174,474
Members
232,748
Latest member
Maineguy1961
Back
Top