I've been gone 2 1/2 hours - are they only on #2???
Actually, a great tactic. I learned this in a management class on how to interview. If you are vague enough, the person will become confused and just start to ramble off stuff and views on certain items. The last juror was smart, he would ask them to "give him an example" putting the ball back into the DT court.
I know it is hard to believe, but I think the DT is smarter than they would like us to believe. Maybe not in terms of case and the actual law, but definately when it comes to overall "people skills" and relating to the layman. I think that is why JB wanted a minority bunch. He would be able to relate to them on a personal level in the trial, and he could confuse everyone who did not understand the technical stuff and laws.
I feel like this prospective juror is getting a little annoyed. Does anyone notice that? he just seems a little short/tired.... done/
He will most likely been striken for a freind being killed by the sniper.
Everytime I hear AF mention this, I can't help but to think back to Caylee's autopsy , where they found something "about the skull & the plates of bones that are separated by sutures" there was even discussion about how casey probably left her in a crib for hours at a time ect.. Does anyone else recall this?
I think ole AF might be trying to say maybe its an inherited condition, and caseys head is fused....lol..
He had a friend that was killed by the sniper guy and he could not remember checking yes on the sheet? Ok..............
Based on what? His bias against snipers?
ETA - that probably came across much more rude than I intended it. Just curious why you think he would be striken based on that?