To the man on INsession: what else should they have investigated?
He says, what Jose is trying to do on cross is show how LE did not "follow up" on other things and how they focused only on her.
Did he hear the same recording we all did? What else should LE have followed up on other than what Casey was telling them?
Tell me, don't just say that is what he is trying to do and not have an example: what else should have LE been following up on?
What? The pool? The shed? Why? Why and how could they know or have any ideas to go on about a little girl they never met-other than what the mother is telling them?
What?
Oh, and Jose has the same cross of Yuri he had yesterday. The same. :loser:
I dont belive they did a thing wrong.
Here they have a mother of a missing child. A child who has been missing for 31 DAYS. a mother who has done nothing but lie to them. They followed her stories, Followed up on what she told them. SHE WAS A SUSPECT
THERE Is no MOTHER on earth who would LIE this much to the police about the most stupidest and inconsequential CARP IF IN FACT THEIR CHILD HAD TRULY AND HONESTLY BEEN KIDNAPPED!
So, from a LE stand point, SHE WAS A SUSPECT.
I would bet good money that YM JA and AW had never in their lives seen something like this before. They gave her the benefit of the doubt for 24 hours. They took her word for it, and as her BS unraveled in a mess at their feet, it became VERY obvious to ANYONE who truly wanted to find that child, that ICA was A SUSPECT!
FACT.
No mother with a kidnapped child FOR REAL would string this tale of lies knowing full well that every SECOND their child was in danger. Its just unfathomable.
Any thing the DT tries to suggest at this point is moot. A logical, rational, emotional, empathetic, understanding, SANE person would realize that Mothers with kidnapped children do not play games with law enforcement. Every lie told just puts that child further and further in danger. THAT IS LOGICAL.
ICA is OUT of her mind IMO!
