Rallihanna
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 813
- Reaction score
- 2
I don't really understand the big deal of this... they corrected it; doesn't change the testimony at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am worried about mistrial right now.
Who is up next???
Are you suggesting that the SA dumb it down to level the playing field?
All that proves is Jose theory that Caylee was never in that trunk.
HHJP does seem to be different that the past month. Could be the trial is taking a toll if he doesn't feel well.
Wonder if something else isn't going on in regard to the huge amount of sidebars where the judge is schooling JB day after day.
Could there be pressure on the judge for a mistrial based on JB's lack of skill and the fact that the remainder of the DT is on the sidelines when their area of expertise would benefit ICA to have them cross.
I wondered who did discover it was the wrong piece of evidence.
I am so lost. Trying to understand.... there were two cans of stink, or three, or whatever....and they are saying that he was handed the 'wrong can' of stink to identify before he testified? Stink is stink. He was testifying to the stink, period.
What is the problem?!?!
I'm really confused especially since I haven't been able to watch the trial this morning until now...
This wasn't Vass's mistake at the lab, it was JA's mistake in asking him about the wrong can yesterday. It was JA's mistake, not Vass's. It doesn't color his work at all because it has nothing to do with his work. He did not misidentify this can when he went to process it. That is not the mistake at all. The chain of custody is intact. The only mistake was JA's in asking him to say that can was the right one. That has nothing to do with chain of custody or Vass's work. This is not a mistake to get upset over. JA has had a sterling reputation in his career and in the past three years. At least he admitted to his mistake. Baez has made millions of mistakes and never admitted or apologized for ONE of them. I trust Ashton anyday over Baez. If Baez harps on this, it's only going to make things worse for Casey.
It wasn't whether or not it was within the law. JB hardly is inexperienced and a seasoned prosecutor such as Jeff Ashton can let Baez walk into various holes left, right and centre. That is sneaky in my view.
Are you suggesting that the SA dumb it down to level the playing field?
I am unsure if the can was coming in here. All we have is Bill Shaeffer's guess. The SA objection was in relation to questioning regarding something not in evidence. There is nothing to indicate in the objection that the state were seeking to open the can.