HRCODEPINK
Verified Insider
How sad is it that I kinda feel the same way...but also feel that even he is better than JB?
2011.06.10 Sidebar (Trial Day Fifteen)
- Thread starter beach
- Start date
Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread
- Status
How sad is it that I kinda feel the same way...but also feel that even he is better than JB?
logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
Why don't you watch the interactive on wesh/interactive? wftv makes me crazy with all the stuff going on on the page. And the screen is so tiny.
The screen on wesh is a fair size, has the little one of ICA in the corner and the tweets running up the right hand size of the page.
Cavalier Attitude
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2011
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
Just chiming in here; I have read here since I can't remember when...summer of 2008. My youngest grand daughter is four months younger than Caylee. Today was just super tough emotionally for me; I think hearing Dr. G. on the stand slammed it all in my face, once again. During her testimony, all I could 'see' was my Emma's lovely long hair and her smile. Thank you ALL for 'being here'; the updates are invaluable to me; I peek in/out from the office all day long, and am grateful to have such a wonderful source of info and opinions.
logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
luvmy4brats
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 299
- Reaction score
- 0
Snipped and bolded by me..
Yesterday's pictures did it. I saw a huge change in him last night.
Next we go all emo with Jesse, maybe his dad, and the two girlfriends who loved Casey (Kristine and Anna?), +
It will tug at our hearts and the hearts of the jurors.
LancelotLink
Better Days
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 5,371
- Reaction score
- -26
:floorlaugh:
logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
By the way - I do know it is easy to do if you are watching the link on CNN but there is no interactive with them. I have tried it with a full screen there but I don't like it because the pixels are a mess. The picture isn't sharp at all.
But they give you the option with a right click I believe.
HRCODEPINK
Verified Insider
:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:
I have to say, when Yuri Melich testified I thought he was awesome....Then Dr. Vass came up and he blew me away...but Dr. G- she is my hero! I was AMAZED at how she handled CM. She did not allow him to corner her into a yes/no answer and she made sure to let the jury know exactly what I wanted them to think about "There is NO ONE who covers up an accidental death unless there is a reason to cover it up" and then she went in for the kill to emphasize that this body was bagged up and hidden in the woods because whoever did it did NOT want it to be found. She was so incredible, I'm going to go on WFTV.com to rewatch it right now. Bottom line, it makes absolutely no sense. If Caylee had accidentally drowned, it's clear that ICA would have reveled in the attention she would get as a mourning mother. I hope the jury sees that- she loves having everything about her. She would have been able to have so much sympathy and attention. She probably regrets that she didn't think of that lie 3 years earlier and drown Caylee instead.
People keep talking about reasonable doubt, but saying Caylee drowned and her and George went through this elaborate scheme (including Roy Kronk) to cover it up and then sit for 3 years on this info while ICA sits in prison, is absurd...not reasonable.
BBM
OMG, with all of the figuring out what really happened, I had never considered this. You should repost this when we think they are watching. Bet you could tell by her face when she read it if she did. She would have totally gotten away with it. No one would have given the "accident" a second thought.
logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
All of the usual media online stations will also be showing it on their links.
camcneishg
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,333
- Reaction score
- 4
earlier I posted that I was out of here.....but after Dr. G today....I just can't stay away!! She was sooooo good today!! My question is this....how much longer do you guys think we have til the "guilty" verdict is read? wonder how much longer the state needs? didn't they say last week that they needed til June 17th? I really do not think it will take the jurors very long to deliberate....heck, they might even set a record....MO
Dr.Fessel
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 10,903
- Reaction score
- 26
:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:
I have to say, when Yuri Melich testified I thought he was awesome....Then Dr. Vass came up and he blew me away...but Dr. G- she is my hero! I was AMAZED at how she handled CM. She did not allow him to corner her into a yes/no answer and she made sure to let the jury know exactly what I wanted them to think about "There is NO ONE who covers up an accidental death unless there is a reason to cover it up" and then she went in for the kill to emphasize that this body was bagged up and hidden in the woods because whoever did it did NOT want it to be found. She was so incredible, I'm going to go on WFTV.com to rewatch it right now. Bottom line, it makes absolutely no sense. If Caylee had accidentally drowned, it's clear that ICA would have reveled in the attention she would get as a mourning mother. I hope the jury sees that- she loves having everything about her. She would have been able to have so much sympathy and attention. She probably regrets that she didn't think of that lie 3 years earlier and drown Caylee instead.
People keep talking about reasonable doubt, but saying Caylee drowned and her and George went through this elaborate scheme (including Roy Kronk) to cover it up and then sit for 3 years on this info while ICA sits in prison, is absurd...not reasonable.
How many times did CM get Dr. G to say it was a homicide? I think he got her to state it around 10 times. Great work for the State CM!!!!
1tasha
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2010
- Messages
- 398
- Reaction score
- 1
I agree. The closest I come to sympathy for his client is when I'm watching Baez in action. I can't believe he's been working on this for 3 years. What did he do during that time? I wouldn't even buy a bikini from this man.
TotallyObsessed
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,096
- Reaction score
- 1
Sorry - just now back in for a few minutes and saw the chatter up thread about the post I made about Judge Perry stating tha the could hold his ruling on Motions for Mistrial until the verdict. We need to ask a lawyer, but here's a little something I found.
In 1985 the Florida Supreme Court lamented how widespread improper closing arguments had become and took a significant step toward alleviating the prejudice imposed on the party aggrieved by the improper argument.[20] In Ed Ricke & Sons, Inc. v. Green,[21] the court held that when a party makes a timely motion for mistrial based on an improper closing argument, the trial court can withhold ruling on the motion until after the jury has returned a verdict.[22] If the verdict is satisfactory to the movant, the court does not need to rule on the motion.[23] In addition, there is no need for a new trial or an appeal.[24] The Ed Ricke rule essentially eliminates any plausible excuse for failing to preserve the record by parties aggrieved by improper argument.[25]
source: http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...d=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com
In 1985 the Florida Supreme Court lamented how widespread improper closing arguments had become and took a significant step toward alleviating the prejudice imposed on the party aggrieved by the improper argument.[20] In Ed Ricke & Sons, Inc. v. Green,[21] the court held that when a party makes a timely motion for mistrial based on an improper closing argument, the trial court can withhold ruling on the motion until after the jury has returned a verdict.[22] If the verdict is satisfactory to the movant, the court does not need to rule on the motion.[23] In addition, there is no need for a new trial or an appeal.[24] The Ed Ricke rule essentially eliminates any plausible excuse for failing to preserve the record by parties aggrieved by improper argument.[25]
source: http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...d=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com
nomoresorrow
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 3,576
- Reaction score
- 264
Just viewed the tape from the end of court today....JP's attitude really bothers me the way he handled the mistrial statement..that he has up to the verdict to declare a mistrial....... he was grinning......what is he really saying???
And does anyone have the part where ICA was rushed out of court at the end of the day? I really want to see it... WFTV doesn't show it.
I think what Judge Perry was saying, in a round-about-way to the defense, IF they (the DT) continue to request a mistrial at every turn, he (JP) will take advantage of the time allowed by law to render his decision and, should he read the jury's verdict and it is a not guilty verdict, he (JP) COULD at that time (BEFORE/WITHOUT rendering the jury's verdict) render his own verdict and allow the defenses request for a mistrial. Hope that helps!
- Status