hannahsnana
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2008
- Messages
- 425
- Reaction score
- 1
That picture of ICA in court today is really scary.
Not that I'm aware of but I listened to it all again this evening and I wrote down every time his name was mentioned in the OS. 3 times his name was mentionedThat's interesting. I don't remember the State mentioning JG's name in the opening statement. Is there a transcript of the written opening statement somewhere? Anyone?
I've heard speculation that the state is saving some witnesses for rebuttal. I hope nobody important. The defense might very well rest their case without putting on a defense. Mason did that in one of his big trials. Certainly fits the defense M.O. of taking the easy way out. The state would be prevented from putting on rebuttal witnesses. Seems risky.
I was thinking that too.. It just seems when all the world is spinning that The Fathers day is easier to spit out than coming up with a date ..just too logical ..
WHat do you suppose she's thinking when she does this in front of the cameras? SHe knows she's under a microscope.That picture of ICA in court today is really scary.
Not that I'm aware of but I listened to it all again this evening and I wrote down every time his name was mentioned in the OS. 3 times his name was mentioned
Well Cindy did say 31 days..ya only need to look at a calender..I guess that would be a moot arguement..
If it was the first one...it could have been LE. In lots of the early docs they had the date(s) wrong. It used to drive us crazy.Actually, it was KC who said 31 days, but also said "June 9th', which is more than 31 days.
CA said "a month" but @ the same time also said "June 7th" which is more than a month.
I'm simply noticing the discrepancy in the time frame & the dates (including the missing child poster with the missing date as June 9, 2008).
And then there's GA saying he saw KC and Caylee on the morning of June 16.
Who had the missing child poster printed with the June 9th date & when?
Whats wrong with that Wendy Murphy? We need a topic here about the HLN shows. She spouts the most ridiculous stuff and gets away with it. She says Caylee was not with Casey on the 16th and that Casey did not have her car on the 16th. She is intimating that Caylee was at home with george or the grandparents. She has cooked up this whole other scenario. Also, this other guess thinks the State has a lousy case and proved nothing. HLN is trying to get that murderer off and it makes me mad by having all these pro defense witnesses on day after day and no one on poor Caylee's side. I can barely watch that channel anymore.
http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/21249759/detail.html
1st slide off center top right looks like it is there, can see the bottom part of the heart upside down. If indeed that is it. The lines look to well formed not to be.
Pheobeb, if the one in the duct tape thread is not the one you are looking for but the actual pink sticker photo I am looking for it now. I looked at it just two days ago on a MSM PDF file that contained pics of the lettering from shirt, the tattered clothing, the pooh blanket and other items found at crime scene. If I find it I will link it
I'm not typically a Cindy supporter,but I gotta say .....SHE WAS FLIPPIN' OUT!
Caylee was now missing (news to her) and the car smelled like a dead body!
I dare anyone to be completely rational in that moment.It's surreal! It's a shock,an out of body experience,like this can't really be happening,this happens to other people on the news,flippin out:crazy:
Gotta tell ya, Miss James....I thank you for keeping it forefront, but every time I read one of your posts, and then see your signature photo...I get all enraged again! :banghead:
Anyone see that screenshot pop up in media tonight??? I would LOVE to see Baez face when HE sees it...and knows the world has seen it too!!! :rocker:
I think we'll see more witnesses before the State rests,just short and sweet and quick. But yes,I think that's a possibility.The DT could choose to rest as well. I still trust the SA's!
Gah! I can't wait to see who will testify tomorrow!
Could the FBI have located the daddy? I think so. They have had 3 years.
What about NCIS. Didn't they get involved. too. ?
Have we heard from anyone from NCIS? If. not... maybe an expert from there?
I've heard speculation that the state is saving some witnesses for rebuttal. I hope nobody important. The defense might very well rest their case without putting on a defense. Mason did that in one of his big trials. Certainly fits the defense M.O. of taking the easy way out. The state would be prevented from putting on rebuttal witnesses. Seems risky.