How can CM have argued 'we don't know how she died' while asking for the acquital when in the DT's opening statement they specifically stated Caylee died on June 16 as a result of drowning?
__________________Can someone explain to me how CM can explain this discrepancy in his story?
I was just as astounded as you are until I realized two things:
#1 The opening statement is not evidence or proof.
#2 The jury was not present and therefore will not learn of this discrepancy. When the DT continues on, they will likely continue on the premise that Caylee died on June 16th.
:twocents: