2011.06.16 TRIAL Day Twenty (Morning Session)

[adb263]

Ohhhh.. Okay... I get it.

ICA was set up! They (LE) covered up GA's DNA by contaminating it!!!!

Because they were framing ICA!!!

 

[reeseeva]

What nerve Baez has, when Jeff A objects, and Baez answers for the Judge, saying, "she can answer, it's a scientific question"

 

[nerdy]

She is his witness, right?

She looks at him like he is the dumbest thing she has ever seen.

Well she is sworn to tell nothing but the truth.. :innocent:

 

[Quiche]

I've watered my patios, so, there's that...

 

[Jetaime]

Juror # 11 yawns and stretched his hands behind his head in #caseyanthony .
by abcashleigh via twitter at 10:31 AM


About 4 or 5 jurors taking notes. #CaseyAnthony -jfell
by cfnews13casey via twitter at 10:34 AM

 

[Mountain_Kat]

Okay, who's up for a game of gin rummy?

 

[fifteen89]

Burn victims?

 

[Steely Dan]

Here's why the jury got confused:

That is one of the funniest things I've ever seen on this board! :floorlaugh:

Shouldn't that sign read 'next wrong' instead of 'next right'? :floorlaugh: The DT seems to never have any 'rights'.

It should read "Jury Left, bored to tears"

 

[Solomisskitty]

Oh lawd...Cannot.Listen.Anymore.Must.Wake.Up.And.Go.Do.Something/Anything.Else.
Extending sympathy to all listening....later guys and gals!

 

[Donjeta]

Now Caylee didn't drown but burned?

 

[Blue Ridge]

Now there is a 'burn victim' in this case? I thought she was a 'drowning victim'.....

SIGH.

 

[liltexans]

Per the expert, it's possible to obtain a DNA profile from items under water, but there are several factors that would affect that ability, including whether the DNA came from blood, semen, etc. and the environmental factors.

 

[celticthyme]

Well, I am only an RN, but what I "think" his point is that there was some DNA that was unrelated to Caylee or Casey, and in the end the lab tested and determined that it came from someone in the lab that handled the item. ( shame, she should have been wearing gloves)
However his bigger point, might be that you can not trust the DNA, and perhaps forensic evidence at large, because of the possibility of contamination.

??? So if we had Roy Kronk's DNA, could he be eliminated as a suspect, since he was supposed to have moved the body, and his DNA was not present?

(Again, this is all irrelevant, since evidence had been submitted to the elements for 6 months.)

 

[little_miss_smart]

I think JBs tactic is to confuse EVERYONE including himself!

 

[2goldfish]

Here's why the jury got confused:

I saw that and screamed so loud with laughter that my husband got all mad and his mom on the phone had to ask WTH was going on :biglaugh:

 

[Hunnie]

i wonder why kc look like she was going to cry when the fbi lady said it excludes kc?

Cuz her "name" was mentioned and someone said it excludes her...so see shes innocent....LOL

 

[Robyn623]

"Can you get DNA from a burned victim?" WHAT? What does that have to do with anything?

OK...I'm taking a break to hang up my laundry. My ears are killing me.

 

[camcneishg]

state will prob end this with just a few questions....can't wait for that to happen

 

[sumbunny]

This is the most boring testimony so far. Where the hell is baez going with this?
Some questions seem highly irrelevant? DNA from a burn victim?

 

[summerthyme]

Did all the tweeters in the gallery doze off?