2011.06.23 Cindy's Testimony

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
i dont think cindy cares what happens to herself as long and casey is spared the dp.. she is desperate
 
Absolutely - Cindy just opened that door WIDE open for the SA to subpeona all of her work related records, documents, and e-mails. Perhaps previously there wasn't enough evidence to warrant such as Cindy said she didn't make the searches on that date/time (because she was at work). Now that the story has changed, that mack truck will be mowing down that door now! Who knows - they may even bring in some co-workers who received e-mails from Cindy that day or phone calls, etc. I sure can't wait to hear where her cell phone pings are for those days too! I think she's desperately hoping everything (and everyone) has gone poof.

MOO

Mel

Well that is good news. I don't really understand the legalities in US trials.

After defending Cindy yesterday and feeling sorry for her, then watching her testimony I am so upset that she could do this. I have had a complete change of heart. I can no longer sympathise with this woman. I could excuse her behaviour up until now, blaming many of her actions on her losses but she has shown me she only cares about getting Casey out of prison, showing no regard for her grandaughter whatsoever. I have no doubt she loves Caylee and misses her dearly, but she is a distant memory to her now, that is obvious!

I hope they get something that proves Cindy is lying, she should also suffer the consequences for lying.

I wonder what George will say when he takes the stand.
 
im sure cindy will get caught with all of her lies then jailed right along with her daughter .. then mabey everyone would be satisfied.. caylee would have justice .. she could look down from heaven and see her gma who she loved rotting in jail.. i bet shed just love that ..yes if she is lying she should be punished but it just seems like everyone in the world is being of lynch mob mentality.. and again caylee is being forgotten in all this (she loved her GP) and they loved her .. i dont think for one second caylee would ever want her gp to go through what they are .. i dont understand why people act like they do i do however understand no mother wants their child dead.. so i get why cindy did what she did ..she probably figures what she did will get casey life without parole ..not free ..

Casey wanted her child dead. What right does she have to murder her baby girl and why shouldn't she get the ultimate punishment for what she has done? Yes Caylee is forgotten in all of this but not by those who are trying to get her justice. She's forgotten by those you claim loved her.

Sorry, unlike what they make think, the Anthonys are not above the law.
 
Exactly! I'd like to know the "friends" who used the computer. Remember, she wouldn't even let Jessie Grund in the house, let alone any friends. Amy had never met her mom, and I can't find a single friend that met Cindy or hung out at the house using her desktop computer (as if).

Now mind you, we keep our main computer in the living room so I can monitor my teen, and he does have friends over who use our computer to watch you-tube videos, etc. It's not password protected either. But I'd gladly admit to that, and can easily provide the names of the children that have done so (cuz I'm here).

I hope Cindy has a list of names ready - cuz the SA is gonna want to know exactly which "friends" used that computer.

gahhhhh!

MOO

Mel

That's what I mean! She may well have had friends at the house, but highly unlikely in recent years since George was home half day..if not all day during the year prior..and not that Cindy or he would know about for her to make that comment..You know that if Cindy KNEW anyone had been in that house...she would have thrown whomever that was under the bus way back when. Jesse is the only person I've ever heard her mention and that was what..2 years prior...grrr..I can't hardly stand it. I hope we see Cindy be confronted with Gentivas records...something! Like ICA..she will have to be stone cold busted before she admits to anything tho..makes me sick to my stomach..
 
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This might be the BEST article I have read in a very long time. SERIOUSLY.

:great::rocker::woohoo:
JWG, I bow down to your thorough, well researched wisdom.

:blowkiss::tyou::loveyou::skip:

You are spot on - awesome article. This is what gets my hinky meter up!

As far as the alcohol and peroxide, I researched just I was looking through different things that was in our cabinets to make sure that there was nothing that we had in our cabinets that Caylee would get into because we didn’t keep, like, you know, cleaning supplies in the bathrooms. The only thing I kept in the bottom bathrooms that we had locked was alcohol and peroxide.

And I knew alcohol could be costly


ummm, errrr, I'm assuming she's talking about rubbing alcohol and not alcohol-alcohol, like a nice pinot-noir. I can buy a drum of rubbing alcohol at rite-aid for about 4 bucks.

And, um, err, wouldn't a nurse know that ANY cleaning supplies left unsecured in a bathroom cabinet would NOT be safe for any toddler - regardless of the circumstances. Someone please raise their hand if they think alcohol and peroxide is something they would need to look up to determine if it was safe for a 2 year old to digest?

Anyone?

Thought so ;)

MOO

Mel
 
Absolutely - Cindy just opened that door WIDE open for the SA to subpeona all of her work related records, documents, and e-mails. Perhaps previously there wasn't enough evidence to warrant such as Cindy said she didn't make the searches on that date/time (because she was at work). Now that the story has changed, that mack truck will be mowing down that door now! Who knows - they may even bring in some co-workers who received e-mails from Cindy that day or phone calls, etc. I sure can't wait to hear where her cell phone pings are for those days too! I think she's desperately hoping everything (and everyone) has gone poof.

MOO

Mel

I wondered this same thing and was reading in the verified atty thread (I think it was) where someone asked that very question and said something about reading that it was too late for the prosecution to try and retrieve the records from Gentiva.. I don't understand that if it is true..Didn't see an answer from an atty regarding that though... I sure hope not..
 
I haven't read the whole thread yet, but this has been just fascinating to me. SHE is the reason I got into this case in the first place. That Cindy is truly a piece of work.

I feel just a little naughty, because I was actually laughing all the way through her testimony yesterday, and I know this is no laughing matter. But good gracious, this woman is so ghastly, it's hilarious.

When she said even Casey's friends used the computer, that was so transparent. Cindy, you are a real... I wanna say a bad word. Is jerk a bad word? Casey's friends were never even in that house except maybe at Caylee's birthday party.

I loved it when she was so insistent that there is NO POSSIBLE WAY!!!! to find her emails and computer activity at Gentiva from three years ago, and there is NO POSSIBLE WAY that anybody but she, herself, can access her email because she has a password that only she knows. Has she not been paying attention? Does she not know that the only way to erase your computer's history is by taking a sledge hammer to it? She clearly has no conceptually understanding of servers and all that entails. An employer can get into your computer in the blink of an eye, even if you have enough passwords to last a lifetime.

I also found it laughable that she thinks Gentiva wouldn't hold on to any of her old records, time sheets, or whatever. There is something called the Legal Document Retention List, it may vary state to state, I'm not sure, but it's a list of all kinds of records and by law how long the company has to keep them for. For example, time sheets = 5 years, expense reports = 3 years, accounting journal entries = 20 years, payroll/taxes = PERMANENT. As for Legal issues, I believe that's pretty much a permanently stored box of files. And you darn well better believe that the SECOND this hit the airwaves on July 16, 2008, Gentiva locked that stuff up tighter than a battleship.

I think my favorite part was when she said something like I didn't do that, but I don't know what my computer does on its own. HAHAHAH. That was great.

By the way, did anybody catch Linda Drane Burdick's face as Cindy left the stand? Watch that part, it's HILARIOUS. She looks up from under her eyeglasses at Cindy, and her expression is so beautiful.
 
Gnatcatcher..how 'bout she doesn't know what her computer was doing when asked about certain searches? What??? My pc doesn't usually do searches while I sleep, does yours, lol?


eta~its time for bed..I missed where you said the same thing...i couldn't believe it when she said that!
 
respectfully snipped from Gnatcatcher..

I think my favorite part was when she said something like I didn't do that, but I don't know what my computer does on its own. HAHAHAH. That was great.




Say what Cindy?..and what kind of computer is this again?
 
I think Cindy came home early one afternoon to find a sedated dog. She may have seen an open browser and looked up things before the password got changed
 
I do admit I have a lot of angry feelings towards CA.
Even though it breaks my heart to think of the situation she's in I feel like she created it in the first place.

In my opinion, CA is in a situation of her own making and I haven't one shred of sympathy for her.
 
(I agree with "no shred of sympathy" - the family has made the monsters by their parenting 'skills' - Cindy's I - Me - Mine comments don't give other personalities much choice but to fight for their selfishness, too.)

Why didn't Burdick ask the NAME of that "close friend with injuries"? I'm curious about that. Letting the Anthonys get by with any made-up identity seems to be NOT a wise thing - they've already had ONE DEATH using made-up IDs. Why not ask for names and let them know EVERY fact will be checked and double-checked. They have spent a lifetime lying, but they never get checked!

I don't think it's a coincidence that the prior day's release of "Anthonys no longer consider Casey innocent" is followed up by Cindy's attempts to remove "pre-meditation" from the charges.

Bet the DA wishes they'd have the Anthonys under surveillance!

Uh... do you realize that this is the FIRST EVER witness that Baez went after with direct questions? Straight to HIS point? That's a first in this trial. Curious! Like he'd finally prepared and coached HIS witness - for the first time.
 
I missed yesterday afternoon's testimony (took my mom to the doctor) and have been trying to catch up on reading/watching a few snippets of CA's testimony. IIRC, she mentioned emails she received would contain referrals as well as emails from other employees that, one would assume, would contain patient information. It would seem that any email correspondence with respect to particular patients would have to be printed to hard copy or otherwise retained as part of the patient's record. For instance, Dr. X's office emails CA with a patient referral for Jane Doe, or Nurse Ratchett emails CA with information relevant to a particular patient, that information would have to be printed or otherwise retained in the patient's database. I did a cursory search on record retention laws in Fla., and it appears the standard is 7 years. I find it hard to believe that any bonafide health care facility would not have some method of retention of all patient-related records/correspondence (which would include patient-related emails) for the required period of time....
 
Why didn't Burdick ask the NAME of that "close friend with injuries"? I'm curious about that. Letting the Anthonys get by with any made-up identity seems to be NOT a wise thing - they've already had ONE DEATH using made-up IDs. Why not ask for names and let them know EVERY fact will be checked and double-checked. They have spent a lifetime lying, but they never get checked!

I don't think it's a coincidence that the prior day's release of "Anthonys no longer consider Casey innocent" is followed up by Cindy's attempts to remove "pre-meditation" from the charges.

Bet the DA wishes they'd have the Anthonys under surveillance!

Uh... do you realize that this is the FIRST EVER witness that Baez went after with direct questions? Straight to HIS point? That's a first in this trial. Curious! Like he'd finally prepared and coached HIS witness - for the first time.

Oh I don't think LDB is done with Cindy Anthony..not by a long shot! Just giving her enough rope imo...and I agree about Jose preparing his witness..Only thing is I believe he was doing that up until Cindy and George found out where the bus was headed a few weeks ago...so he had a head start there..
 
In my opinion, CA is in a situation of her own making and I haven't one shred of sympathy for her.

You know, I didn't either until she testified the first time..I was actually stupid enough to believe for a minute that she really was going to be Caylee's voice..Won't make that mistake twice I promise you!
 
so she has testified that she did not have a myspace acct back in March 2008..so how is she going to explain that the chloroform search was back to back with a myspace login? Can't wait to hear that..AND why those searches apparently were the only things deleted manually? Why would she delete that and NOTHING else? ..she wouldn't..cuz she didn't do the search!
 
Testimony Continues After Casey's Mom Shocks Court

~snip~

She said she started searching chlorophyll, but Google sent her elsewhere. Her attorney said she's telling the truth and not just trying to protect Casey.

"She testified as truthfully today as she did when she testified for the state of Florida,” said attorney Mark Lippman.

Lippman said Cindy Anthony’s memory is now better because of medication, and now she remembers being home from work on the day "chloroform" was Goggled.

Cindy's work records indicate she was at work, and prosecutors asked her to read aloud a question from an earlier deposition on the same subject, chloroform searches.

more at link

http://www.wftv.com/news/28342780/detail.html

Goggled? not my mistake, I copy and pasted it! WFTV needs a proofreader or spellcheck!
 
Posted earlier..but too important not to repeat...


There are some important things to understand about the content of this spreadsheet. Recall an early investigative report by Det. Yuri Melich in which he says he asked computer CSI Sandra Cawn to search for the keyword “chloroform” on the Anthony computer. She did so and found references to the word in unallocated space – meaning the references had been purposely deleted. According to the report, there were searches for the word at Google, as well as similar searches for the ingredients and recipe for chloroform. Also, all of these searches were done from the Firefox browser.



http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/03/05/the-google-searches-and-cindy/
 
so she has testified that she did not have a myspace acct back in March 2008..so how is she going to explain that the chloroform search was back to back with a myspace login? Can't wait to hear that..AND why those searches apparently were the only things deleted manually? Why would she delete that and NOTHING else? ..she wouldn't..cuz she didn't do the search!

right, if you read JWG's posts on the research he did on the subject he concludes C&G did not use the Firefox browser or Google. They used IE browser and Yahoo search engine on the "Casey" account which was not password protected but the "owner" account was. IIRC the Firefox browser and it's contents were deleted, later found in the unallocated space on the hard drive. LE got lucky the computer was not used enough to overwrite the files and they could still retrieve them.
 
Testimony Continues After Casey's Mom Shocks Court

~snip~

She said she started searching chlorophyll, but Google sent her elsewhere. Her attorney said she's telling the truth and not just trying to protect Casey.

"She testified as truthfully today as she did when she testified for the state of Florida,” said attorney Mark Lippman.

Lippman said Cindy Anthony’s memory is now better because of medication, and now she remembers being home from work on the day "chloroform" was Goggled.

Cindy's work records indicate she was at work, and prosecutors asked her to read aloud a question from an earlier deposition on the same subject, chloroform searches.

more at link

http://www.wftv.com/news/28342780/detail.html

Goggled? not my mistake, I copy and pasted it! WFTV needs a proofreader or spellcheck!

bbm~

pffftt..and I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn if anyone is interested..Cindy..just like her daughter wouldn't know the truth if it bit her in the azz..
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
194
Total visitors
275

Forum statistics

Threads
608,469
Messages
18,239,870
Members
234,384
Latest member
Sleuth305
Back
Top