crimesnooper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2011
- Messages
- 582
- Reaction score
- 382
BBM-
I've never understood this POV. Why is LA not a killer then? Was there some profound difference in the way they raised him?
My belief is that sweet Caylee died because of Casey and Casey alone. Casey was the one with jealousy issues. Casey was the one who demanded all the attention. Casey was the one who thought the world revolved around her.
People may say that is due to how she was raised, but then once again we go back to why didn't LA have this same narcissistic mindset if it was a result of bad parenting?
No doubt that this is a dysfunctional family, but I'd consider most families dysfunctional, and they are certainly not all killers.
I do agree though that CA likely has a LOT of guilt issues, as most parents do with their kids. I do believe she blames herself and she lives with the 'if onlys' every day of her life and she is trying to save ICA's life because she wasn't able to save Caylee's. She probably thinks if she had been strong enough to sue for custody that they wouldn't be where they are today.
But how could anyone have predicted that ICA would kill her daughter, especially when there were no warning signs of abuse? Who could predict that a bunch of stupid lies were a pre-curser to murder?
JMO
IA with your motive theory. People often say no two children are raised in the same home..meaning parents treat children differently becuase of age, gender, experience, temperment and personality. I think some of ICA is just genentic or biological and also parenenting or lack of. But I see huge similarities between ICA and CA in personality. Many families will have several kids who are just great, caring, responsible, humans beings and then the one who is anything but. Same family. Go figure. JMO