2011.07.03 TRIAL Day Thirty-four - DEFENSE (JB) CLOSING ARGUMENTS

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Casey Anthony is an innocent angel.

Meanwhile, the State and ALL of their witnesses are liars and are committing fraud and perjury and a host of other crimes. ALL of them.

But Casey didn't do anything. Good Luck with the jury believing that.

Cry for me now, Jose.
 
JB: "There are no such searches of being 84 times for chloroform." Good-googly-goo, that character cannot put a sentence together to save his life.

BTW: If ICA didn't know what it was, why did CA lie about looking it up herself?
 
Small question from me:

Has Baez presented any evidence yet of KC's innocense? *rolleyes*
 
They must of told Casey to keep and hold the same look/pose from this morning when she realized she was going to be found guilty.
 
WAIT, so now defense is dropping their testimony by CA that SHE did chloroform search??? I hope SA brings this up!
 
I can understand why people want Jose Baez to flop but he is making points if one takes an objective look at it through eyes of jurors.
I don't want him to flop; I want him to stop thinking ad homs mean a damn. The minute he personally attacked the State and the witnesses, he lost; he has no rational argument.

My opinion. If I were a juror, I'd be completely disgusted.

And I'm sick and tired of this sleaziness being excused because he's a defense lawyer.

Plenty of them have ethics and don't slime people.
 
He has like 3 more hours to go!!! I don't think I can take it!
 
Baez will continue to do this crap because there isn't any consequences. Who cares if the judge orders it struck, it is out there. Hopefully the jury is seeing just how low the defense will stoop to win a big case.

Truthfully, I doubt the jury is concerned with proper court procedure. They are concerned with the truth. They know, imo, that JB is flailing. They have been there through all the testimony. They took notes. This closing doesn't mean much in the truth of this trial. They know that, imo. :seeya:
 
Question: what were the objections for?

Also, I know you don't want to hear this but, I've never listened to a trial, and if I were on the jury, this is at least sounding like it MIGHT be something I would consider. It's making me confused, so I can't help but wonder, if it's doing the same to some of the jury.

That being said: I believe she did it ... without a doubt! MOO ...
 
Baez. Please. The computer searches cannot find the word Chloroform in a jpeg, gif, or other picture! Take assembly language. It CANT happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
190
Total visitors
263

Forum statistics

Threads
609,002
Messages
18,248,422
Members
234,523
Latest member
MN-Girl
Back
Top