---i should have quoted all of what juror #2 said in the article:
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/0...prosecutors-where-was-the-evidence/?hpt=ju_t2
Juror No.2, who the Times reported is a black male, married and a father of two young children, said he was the last holdout on the jury
who wanted to convict Anthony on a lesser charge of aggravated manslaughter, which would have carried a prison term of up to 15 years, according to the newspaper.
The prosecution's
inability to prove who was Caylee's caretaker at the time of her death, Casey Anthony or the girl's grandparents, doomed the manslaughter charge, Juror No. 2 said.
----for him------he did believe that kc should be found guilty of count 3 : aggravated manslaughter , except he couldn't figure out if she was a caregiver at the time or not------and so couldn't go with that decision.
----how is it POSSIBLE that he was ready to convict her on manslaughter ( and then could not decide if she was a caregiver of caylee at the time????? so was convinced by the other 11 to drop it.)-----and he did.