everyoneneedsavoice
Verified Health Professional - Registered Nurse
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,810
- Reaction score
- 0
So they want those inept, lying, evidence destroying cops to come out and take a look at their phones?
The iorny...
So they want those inept, lying, evidence destroying cops to come out and take a look at their phones?
I draw the line at the defense lying, telling fairy tales, and defaming victims of the defendant's crimes.Hated the verdict, hated the smarmy defense team. But they did their job. We can't have a legal system that denies a trial to despicable people. Where would you draw the line?
I know, but threats are just sinking to the level of the opponent. Always pays to take the high road.I know that it is not okay to threaten people. But is it okay to make up vile stories about rape and incest, and accuse an innocent man in front of the world, just to allow a guilty woman to walk free?
Okay, I have to ask.....who is "LF?" :waitasec:
I know that it is not okay to threaten people. But is it okay to make up vile stories about rape and incest, and accuse an innocent man in front of the world, just to allow a guilty woman to walk free?
I had the same problem when she told me the story! It must be a 1950's term for nightie! I wondered "well what's wrong with wearing a knit sweater set?!
I draw the line at the defense lying, telling fairy tales, and defaming victims of the defendant's crimes.
I don't blame the DT for the verdict or for doing their job. I do blame them for the way they did it and the people they damaged along the way. That's where I draw the line.Hated the verdict, hated the smarmy defense team. But they did their job. We can't have a legal system that denies a trial to despicable people. Where would you draw the line?
:rocker::rocker: Good Point, Dr. Fessel !! :great::great:
If I was the 9-1-1 dispatcher and it was CM or JB or one of the Anthony's calling for help, I would tell them an officer will be there in 31 Days ...
Seriously ...
:great::great:
I know, but threats are just sinking to the level of the opponent. Always pays to take the high road.
I know, but threats are just sinking to the level of the opponent. Always pays to take the high road.
I don't blame the DT for the verdict or for doing their job. I do blame them for the way they did it and the people they damaged along the way. That's where I draw the line.
Though I completely disapprove of stalking or seriously threatening people, that type of behavior does sometimes result when the guilty are not held accountable, or when the not guilty are blamed without cause...which is why I believe it should be just as important to convict the guilty as it is not to convict the innocent. When there is corruption or serious inefficiency in government systems, a by product of those failures can be that people, frustrated and angry, may resolve to take matters into their own hands. That's why it's important to constantly improve our legal system and not allow sleazy, underhanded tactics to free the guilty.
I know, but threats are just sinking to the level of the opponent. Always pays to take the high road.
Please think again. I lost my child to a drunk driver. It's both stupid (senseless) AND evil.
I totally agree, chefmom. I do not condone vigilantiism or violence under any circumstances. But I would think that Mason's actions after the verdict did nothing to quell the understandably angry citizens. In fact, I'll go out on a limb and say I'm sure it fanned the flames. One would think a gentleman of his breeding would know better. Very disappointing. JMO
That's not really what I said. I'm fine with people being angry.In other words, YOU wouldn't ever threaten or stalk anyone, but the people are angry and you can't fault them if their moral code isn't your own.
That's not really what I said. I'm fine with people being angry.