Megnut
A piece of peace is peace enough.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 12,213
- Reaction score
- 211,372
This exchange keeps nagging me.
AT is questioning Detective Payne --
AT: are you testifying that Mr. Kohberger did not use Hwy 95 South of Moscow...?
Investigator Payne: I am testifying there are various routes a a person could take....
He goes on to point out that the PC route is a possible route and the map indicates that (in the heading)
Is that a slip on AT's part? She doesn't slip often.... but she failed to say allege.... or the Elantra... or the Elantra the State alleges Mr. Kohberger is driving....
Payne is quick to answer with a person...
So IMO she either wanted to get Payne to commit to that being the Gospel route (so she could park BK somewhere else or claim it couldn't have been him there so -- big jump -- he's innocent) OR she slipped, acknowledging that it is his Elantra with him in it, either on 95 or not. Her question contains her assumption it's him! Assumption = concession!
What say everybody else?
23:30ff
AT is questioning Detective Payne --
AT: are you testifying that Mr. Kohberger did not use Hwy 95 South of Moscow...?
Investigator Payne: I am testifying there are various routes a a person could take....
He goes on to point out that the PC route is a possible route and the map indicates that (in the heading)
Is that a slip on AT's part? She doesn't slip often.... but she failed to say allege.... or the Elantra... or the Elantra the State alleges Mr. Kohberger is driving....
Payne is quick to answer with a person...
So IMO she either wanted to get Payne to commit to that being the Gospel route (so she could park BK somewhere else or claim it couldn't have been him there so -- big jump -- he's innocent) OR she slipped, acknowledging that it is his Elantra with him in it, either on 95 or not. Her question contains her assumption it's him! Assumption = concession!
What say everybody else?
23:30ff