I agree with you and SR has stated that it is indeed missing. The question is why won't LE turn over the data?
Cellphone expert testifies missing data benefits University of Idaho murder suspect
He further testified that it's crucial that he receive all of the AT&T source data and related information for him to verify, given that prosecutors in Latah County are pinning Kohberger to the location of the killings, in part, by his cellphone use and cell tower records.
"It is a terrible practice to justify probable cause with these very detailed call detail records that give breadcrumb-like trails for individuals and then not map it," Ray said.
"Because of the piecemealing of the data, because of the missing data, because of the data I'm reviewing that is incredibly inaccurate, everything that is missing is absolutely in benefit of the defense right now," Ray testified, adding, "There are other reports that are missing that I can't tell you are benefiting of Mr. Kohberger or the state."
He added that it's unclear why certain data is unavailable: "Is this human error? Is it accidental? Is it intentional?"
Sometimes its just games D and P play with each other in the pre-trial phase. Sometimes there are legitimate reasons, sometimes not.
Maybe P is still recovering and analyzing new data/video, etc. or analyzing a different way and they're not finished yet. Maybe they've decided to add a new expert or two to analyze evidence and aren't ready. In this case they may be dragging their feet to make D give them the alibi evidence, while D is withholding the alibi evidence because they want to see what else the P has.
When the deadlines come, when it gets down to the trial, both sides will have met their obligations and will have enough time to analyze the discovery.
Last edited: