sissi
Former Member
There will be no apologies, because no one will change their position. Sad, but true.
The guy left saliva, I remember this from the early news segments, not having his DNA was not an oversight on the part of the BPD, if they don't have it,IT IS CRIMINAL IMO on their part, it means they didn't want it!
An interesting comment, heard last night, "never has blood found comingled with dna of a murderer been put aside as insignificant before" ,"there was no area of foreign dna in the panties other than the amount comingled in two different areas". "Areas without blood, were free of foreign dna". IMO this leads me to think the "nice little fraternity of LE will say crap to back each other". Lee doesn't know better, okay he found the preservative in the sample of OJ's blood, leading a jury to set OJ free, but, did he consider EDTA could have been in the tube? He really isn't our brightest bulb, we are just easily impressed. However he should have known that foreign dna in the underwear of a molested/murdered child points to a killer!
The guy left saliva, I remember this from the early news segments, not having his DNA was not an oversight on the part of the BPD, if they don't have it,IT IS CRIMINAL IMO on their part, it means they didn't want it!
An interesting comment, heard last night, "never has blood found comingled with dna of a murderer been put aside as insignificant before" ,"there was no area of foreign dna in the panties other than the amount comingled in two different areas". "Areas without blood, were free of foreign dna". IMO this leads me to think the "nice little fraternity of LE will say crap to back each other". Lee doesn't know better, okay he found the preservative in the sample of OJ's blood, leading a jury to set OJ free, but, did he consider EDTA could have been in the tube? He really isn't our brightest bulb, we are just easily impressed. However he should have known that foreign dna in the underwear of a molested/murdered child points to a killer!