Click said they misrepresented his opinions about the
nature (and maybe motive?) of the crime, not who committed it, from what I understand (IMO MOO). He didn't say that means those people aren't involved (IMO MOO), though, and in fact 6 months later (after he said the D twisted things),
he doubled down on saying he still thinks those people are involved and there was more evidence against them, in his opinion, than Richard Allen.
This is just my understanding of Todd Click's stance. I think it's entirely possible he thinks those people were at least involved and even if it wasn't ritualistic, it was, for some reason, made to look that way.
IMO MOO