For the time frame that LE was investigating. I would think that would certainly not be the 12th nor the15th...that in-between, I would guess. You know the coroner can give a pretty hood idea of when they died as well as Libby's phone.
Yep theorizing on the information I've read from the filings in the case.
Katharine Ramsland noted other motivations:
Stephen Muller. the alibi discussion begins at page 70 if you are interested. March 18, 2024 Motion to Dismiss Hearing.pdf
No but advice from his lawyers might be present in RA's case. They are untrustworthy, IMO.
To tell your client to continue to make confessions while awaiting trial to somehow lessen the effect of a prior confession is truly one of the oddest defenses I have ever heard. It makes absolutely no sense to me.
If the Defense ever shows up for one, even though they say they've had to beg for them. moo
Thank you, I couldn't place the initials. Yes I've read them all...well the ones available. Still wanting very much to read the hearing, June 15, 2023?, IIRC, where the warden (and others) testified. I've yet to see a transcript.
I was really expecting/hoping to see more this week, especially with so much else going on in the true crime world (Daybell sentencing, Karen Read trial shenanigans, Trump verdict aftermath, etc.) to act as a buffer/distraction! But....nothing except the judge's decision to not recuse herself. Time is still hurtling toward that October trial and......nothing.
. The defense team originally wanted a speedy trial, but then they got late discovery dribbled in from the State and realized they needed more time to both review/investigate based on that discovery, and they'd also need more time than the judge was allowing for the trial. So it had to be moved.
I think if asked the 5 men accused of being murderers in the FM, with no proof, would say it was a negative thing.
Sounds from AB's loooong voicemail discussing the defense case to an unknown person he found on an internet site, they are still quite busy trying to find someone who will agree and testify that all Odins aren't bad, what runes really are, and it was those bad Heathens. Umm, I thought we were past this already, 5 FM's anyone?
What more could there be? I know, I shouldn't even think or ask that, with this case, because a legal bomb will go off
I know, it was we want, we want...then they got, they got...uhhh we bad we don't want after all. Hopefully the D is finally getting to look through everything in discovery and will be ready for October.
Ok I missed something. The D is now saying it was the Heathens who did it?
That is true; the courts make exception for such. I outlined this somewhere in a previous thread.
