m00c0w
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,411
- Reaction score
- 5,760
I think it's basically a couple of things:Thank you! So if her ruling over the PI issue was sealed then how is it ok they D named them as far back a franks memo?! If she denied the request and they paid for it themselves then does that exempt them from breaching a sealed ruling? I’m a bit confused on how they can name him unless he’s not under seal due to not being paid for by the state?
- The items were sealed because they were ex parte communications that the defense did not want to share with the prosecution as it might give away too much of the defense's strategy. The only side harmed in revealing the identity of the PI is the defense, so it's not really worth getting worked up over since they're only injuring themselves.
- Naming the investigator and stating he's been on the case team since December isn't directly leaking the contents of the sealed communications. One can infer things, but they didn't explicitly say anything that I think would be attributable to those documents alone. In fact, we don't even know that he was the subject of the December 2022 filings to begin with.
JMO