Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #189

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because they weren't looking in that place. They saw the pic of Abby in the bridge, realized the girls had crossed the bridge and they were looking for them in the south side of the bridge (->). They were looking for alive girls and thought the girls had crossed the bridge and they were injured somehow. They had no idea the girls had crossed the creek. The place the girls are found it is a "slope", so it was difficult or impossible to see them if they are looking for them in the south side of the bridge. Especially at night.

I'm sure on this thread or the last one I read some were as close as 15 feet away from the girls bodies during that search - that is like 4.5 metres. Searchers that is...
 
When people found the girls next morning, if they were found by searchers it probably happened some contamination in the crime scene. I doubt Sr. Riley said the bodies weren't there at night. Or he will be a huge witness for the defense..
Right. My comment was only regarding him acknowledging the significant contamination at the crime scene. I don’t know of his opinion about whether the girls were there overnight or not.
 
Link please

Im sure I read it on here in these pages somewhere, but it could have been from a newspaper article or somewhere else as some attach sources and links which I do open up from time to time if it interests me enough.

Within the last 7 days.
 
Im sure I read it on here in these pages somewhere, but it could have been from a newspaper article or somewhere else as some attach sources and links which I do open up from time to time if it interests me enough.

Within the last 7 days.


Many of us are called out repeatedly for adding information without a link.
It can be exhausting to gather the information when trying to make a statement, so I understand not always having one ready.

All the same, I understand that there is a need for factual information and not posting rumors.

But, I digress, could you clarify what that means in regards to the case in your opinion?

Please and thank you

Edited by me
 
Many of us are called out repeatedly for adding information without a link.
It can be exhausting to gather the information when trying to make a statement, so I understand not always having one ready.

But, I digress, could you clarify what that means in regards to the case in your opinion?

I was wondering why the girls weren't found sooner than they were and someone mentioned it was because only the other side was searched.

That is why I brought that up because I recalled reading it on here.

I was wondering if perhaps the way the branches were put over them and what have you was done in a way that standing above them or at the same level would have concealed them enough.

JMO

Please and thank you
 
When people found the girls next morning, if they were found by searchers probably happened some contamination in the crime scene. I doubt Sr. Riley said the bodies weren't there at night. Or he will be a huge witness for the defense..

I have never heard Riley claim they weren't there that night (and I don't think GG was implying that). But in episode 6 of the Down the Hill Podcast, Barbara MacDonald asks, "With so many people looking for them that first night, why weren't they found?" Doug Carter answers, "Um...I..I think I'll leave that question...unanswered."

IMO MOO
 
Thank you to the moderator who granted me permission to share this James Renner interview with Kelsi German. I attempted to post it last week, but my post was deleted. Lots of hard work going on here! ;) I originally posted it in response to someone's comment or question about if anyone there at the trails had seen the girls, besides BB who saw two girls resembling Abby and Libby.

My response went something like this: There HAD to be people who saw the girls there that day. Kelsi German told James Renner she saw 10-20 kids her age there when she dropped the girls off in that tiny little parking area. This is a small town with one public high school. You'd think out of the 10-20 kids she saw, at least some of them would have recognized her (if they saw her in the driver's seat, and they probably did since she said they had the windows down and may have even recognized her car....I knew all the cars my friends/classmates drove in high school), and some of them would probably even recognize Libby as her younger sister. I'm so curious what these 10-20 kids have told LE about what they saw that day. Did they see Abby and Libby? Did they see RA? How about BB?

This interview was filmed with a 360 view camera, so you have to drag your finger or your mouse over the screen to turn it around to be able to see James and Kelsi. This is part 1 of a 2-part interview he did with her at the yogurt shop. James has several interviews with family members and they are all good, but I've only permission to share this one :).

It’s unfortunate the interviewer felt the need to interrupt Kelsi mid sentence because it sounds like she qualified the 10-20 kids as being inclusive to kids that were there during the day even before she dropped them off.(14:40 mark)
The question wasn’t about who she saw when she dropped them off but how popular MHB and trails were as a hangout.

I did find it interesting when she was asked if kids jumped off the MHB during the summer she laughed and said that it was too high and the water was “only a foot of water”. (13:38)

 
Last edited:
The question wasn’t about who she saw when she dropped them off but how popular MHB and trails were as a hangout.

RSBM

I was talking about her answer, though. Not the question. "I only saw kids my age there." And she was specifically talking about drop off.

Perhaps it was a false memory.

But, if it wasn't...did these kids see Abby and Libby, I wonder. What did they see? Who did they see? Were some of them possibly the "unknown" phones from the geofence map/data?

IMO MOO
 
I was wondering why the girls weren't found sooner than they were and someone mentioned it was because only the other side was searched.

That is why I brought that up because I recalled reading it on here.

I was wondering if perhaps the way the branches were put over them and what have you was done in a way that standing above them or at the same level would have concealed them enough.

JMO

Well, by the time the search began, day light was quickly fading.

If they were that close, I also imagine that depending on where the searchers stood would be relevant.

Were they still across the creek?
Were they actually on Ron Logan's property?
 
The Hobbs-Tobias case is very disturbing. Suspicion immediately centered on the father as the killer, and after 24 hours of interrogation, Hobbs confessed to the murders. He spent five years in jail awaiting trial while the real killer, former Marine Jorge Avila-Torrez, was attacking and killing others.

That's what's missing in RA's case. None of his confessions happened during interrogation.
 
I think I found the explanation about the 10-20 kids.31:03 until 32:06. She said she didn't see anyone. I think there are even another video with Kelsi talking with Gray Hughes when she explained again the 10-20 kids but I'm not sure. I will try to find that later also.

 
14:45 of linked interview; KG reports there were 10-20 kids there when she dropped them off but less kids when they returned and they started searching. Interviewer asks if she saw anyone hanging about and she says she only saw kids her age.

There were far more people on the trials than appears in the PCA. I am curious if any of these other kids or people reported to LE seeing RA, YBG, OBG, the girls or the first group of family searchers and at what time.

MOO
 
I think I found the explanation about the 10-20 kids.31:03 until 32:06. She said she didn't see anyone. I think there are even another video with Kelsi talking with Gray Hughes when she explained again the 10-20 kids but I'm not sure. I will try to find that later also.

Yes!
She said she knew kids had been there throughout the day, she didn't see anyone at the drop-off.

Thank you for the clarification!
 
I think I found the explanation about the 10-20 kids.31:03 until 32:06. She said she didn't see anyone. I think there are even another video with Kelsi talking with Gray Hughes when she explained again the 10-20 kids but I'm not sure. I will try to find that later also.


She verbally said two different things. There isn't a way to make both statements make sense. One of them isn't correct. But if the first one is correct ("I only saw kids my age there"), those kids could be seriously important eye witnesses. Heck, even if she was outright lying (and I'm not accusing her of that) and did NOT see them, but knew they were there, they are still very important witnesses!! Did any of them see Abby and Libby? Or RA? I hope LE has tracked them all down. Just because they aren't in the PCA doesn't mean they might have provided crucial information.

iMO MOO
 
Yes!
She said she knew kids had been there throughout the day, she didn't see anyone at the drop-off.

Thank you for the clarification!

But she also said she did see kids at drop off. Hence, the confusion. Either way, the fact that so many kids were there means some of them had to have seen the girls. But we've heard nothing like that, even "leaked." It's like they were invisible except to witness BB (who only saw girls "resembling" them so what if it wasn't even them?). I can't remember....did BB know anyone in their families/know the girls - to be able to recognize them?

IMO MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
1,430
Total visitors
1,555

Forum statistics

Threads
603,457
Messages
18,156,978
Members
231,737
Latest member
LarryG
Back
Top