grannygates
On Time Out
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 1,379
- Reaction score
- 8,688
Is this person discussing Walas testimony ? Has that been covered ?Harshman
Is this person discussing Walas testimony ? Has that been covered ?Harshman
Telling someone you are innocent a thousand times means very little if you confess your guilt 61x to a dozen or more people. IMO
If it is true he confessed to his mental health counsellor and to the warden and to some guards and his family, 61x in total, then he already took the first steps towards this. Who knows, he might even say something like this in court during the trial.From what you've said, I am inferring that you mean the defense team is ignoring their own client's wishes to plead guilty so they can get money and fame from this trial.
Pretty sure this goes against the ethical standards attorneys must abide by in their practice of the law.
RA is also currently in front of numerous legal professionals, so if they are basically holding him hostage because they want to make money off him, he probably could just shout to the judge (or whisper since the courtroom is so tiny, allegedly), "I did this! I want to plead guilty!"
IMO MOO
Not at this point.Is the death penalty on the table for this case?
We don't know if the psychosis symptoms were real. But if so, we don't know what caused it.While you're in psychosis due to mental torture?
You have 3 active cell phones that you carry every day? Is one for work? Why do you need to pay for three phones ?LOL, I have 3 and certainly am not into CSAM, drug dealing OR cheating.
In written confessions, he specifies the weapon used
That is damning
You have 3 active cell phones that you carry every day? Is one for work? Why do you need to pay for three phones ?
I think that is pretty unusual. Am I wrong?
It makes sense if it was true, as reported, that death threats were coming in towards him and his family. The original judge was very concerned about how the local jail would be able to protect him because it is not set up with that kind of security measures available."They" claim to have put this man in solitary "for his protection." Then they proceed to literally drive him crazy through their treatment of him. A man who is not even convicted of a crime.
Make it make sense.
My point was that mentioning the victims by name and describing the weapon and the number of times he reportedly confessed and the number of people he confessed to makes it pretty incriminating, overall, imo."Who are they?"
But seriously, mentioning them by name means nothing. It was all over the news for years.
Right, but I seriously doubt that CVS required him to have a work phone. IMOProbably not all the weird for someone who holds two jobs.
I only have one, but I have had a job once where I had to have one and had two. I hated it.
Right, but I seriously doubt that CVS required him to have a work phone. IMO
Yes!!
However, we all know that anybody that would kill 2 teen girls the way they were killed is not "normal".
But ......I don't think mental illness can be his defense.
He is a pervert, more than likely involved in a CSAM ring and it was that part of his life to drive him to Libby & Abby.
JMO
Typically, inmates do not get to keep discovery. I can't believe this particular time would be the exception, especially with the protective order in place to prohibit disclosure to outside persons. Inmates have virtually zero right to privacy, so it would be next to impossible to uphold the protective order.Here are my questions about this:
When did his detailed confessions occur? Was it after he got the Discovery?
Who all had access to the Discovery before he got it? Did the trustees assigned to guard him have access to it? Did they read it?
Did any of the trustees assigned to guard him talk to their family members about him and exchange information with them either before or after these detailed confessions?
See, I had wondered about this and was looking for a lawyer to provide some insight. Richard Allen was given his discovery in his cell, 1000 pages. The prison has protocol that requires all paper to be photocopied (because drugs) so an employee of the prison (civilian? Guard? Who?) photocopied all of this discovery.Typically, inmates do not get to keep discovery. I can't believe this particular time would be the exception, especially with the protective order in place to prohibit disclosure to outside persons. Inmates have virtually zero right to privacy, so it would be next to impossible to uphold the protective order.
JMO
As another regular person, I also think it's legit insane. And I wonder if he was told (either factually or falsely) there was a page or two in there that was drugs...and that's why he ate it.Just as a regular person, I think that is legit insane.
BBMSee, I had wondered about this and was looking for a lawyer to provide some insight. Richard Allen was given his discovery in his cell, 1000 pages. The prison has protocol that requires all paper to be photocopied (because drugs) so an employee of the prison (civilian? Guard? Who?) photocopied all of this discovery.
My concern is that the employee doing this is in turn being exposed to this discovery. They have the ability to read it, have the ability to photocopy additional copies, have the ability to save the originals, what happens to the originals??
This is a mega security/safety concern for me. I do not think that this issue was really thoroughly discussed today so I don’t know how abnormal that is. Just as a regular person, I think that is legit insane.
MOO