I strongly believe most of us here want a fair trial, and only if the prosecution can prove RA’s guilt to a jury BARD, should he then be convicted.
I initially felt the PCA was weak, and the bullet evidence and the witnesses would be heavily disputed at trial.
Ironically, it’s been the defense’s unusual approach that has strengthened my belief that the prosecution’s evidence against RA will be mighty and powerful at trial.
jmo
one feels the defence need a new strategy in any event. if their own witnesses take the stand and say they have no evidence against the alternate odinist suspects RA will likely be found guilty in a straight up comparison IMO as there is evidence against him.
perhaps they will focus on generic SODDI?
MOO.