So there's 6 now? 6 involved in the murders, the Odinist sacrificial murders?
I assume my suspects are the boyfriend to Abby and his dad who have cast iron alibis.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So there's 6 now? 6 involved in the murders, the Odinist sacrificial murders?
Do you know who the third party guys are?So one boy was in school with teachers and friends, so his alibi could not get any stronger. Then one was at work with records and work colleagues. So these are iron-clad alibis IMO.
I am so confused because is the whole school now being accused of covering up and lying?!
Are you saying because we, the general public, don't know who some of these guys are, that they must be guilty of the murders, that LE hasn't checked them out? There's a gag order so unless the DT decides to do another memo and name them, while under a gag order (not unheard of, they've done it before) we the public don't get to know their names. Most likely because they've also been cleared by alibis and are innocent men. MODo you know who the third party guys are?
Are you saying because we, the general public, don't know who some of these guys are, that they must be guilty of the murders, that LE hasn't checked them out? There's a gag order so unless the DT decides to do another memo and name them, while under a gag order (not unheard of, they've done it before) we the public don't get to know their names. Most likely because they've also been cleared by alibis and are innocent men. MO
No you said they all had checked out alibis so I’m still waiting on what the checked out alibis are from you and @Salah11 made reference to a child having an alibi so I wanted to know if they knew generally who the 3rd party guys are because none of them are children.
I don't know, because inquiring minds want to know? Just guessingI'm just reading through things here, and I'm wondering if, during the course of an investigation, a potential suspect is looked at by LE, and found to have an iron clad alibi, and/or other information comes to light absolving that potential person of any responsibility for the crime at hand, would LE continue to investigate that individual in relation to the crime being investigated?
And then, there's this idea that, should a particular avenue of investigation prove to be in error, either by further evidence coming to light, or by legal testimony to the fact that avenue of investigation was in error, would LE continue to investigate that avenue in relation to the crime being investigated?
So one boy was in school with teachers and friends, so his alibi could not get any stronger. Then one was at work with records and work colleagues. So these are iron-clad alibis IMO.
I am so confused because is the whole school now being accused of covering up and lying?!
I feel once more like this might I have been written more for the fan base than the Judge.
We just had a evidential hearing where they had their chance to make the case for a BH+PW theory. This motion simply confirms that it's just fanfic that lacks even one single piece of evidence to connect the 2 men with the crime
MOO
They spent 5 weeks scouring the Wabash River looking for a phone and a knife from KKs confession after they had already confirmed that both KK and TK were at home, actively using their phones all day. With that, they showed that they will still go to great lengths to investigate some people, even if those people have the strongest alibi we have seen in this case to date.I'm just reading through things here, and I'm wondering if, during the course of an investigation, a potential suspect is looked at by LE, and found to have an iron clad alibi, and/or other information comes to light absolving that potential person of any responsibility for the crime at hand, would LE continue to investigate that individual in relation to the crime being investigated?
And then, there's this idea that, should a particular avenue of investigation prove to be in error, either by further evidence coming to light, or by legal testimony to the fact that avenue of investigation was in error, would LE continue to investigate that avenue in relation to the crime being investigated?
Is that information, about LE confirming TK/KAK home alibis first before the Wabash search took place, from the new Memorandum the DT just filed?They spent 5 weeks scouring the Wabash River looking for a phone and a knife from KKs confession after they had already confirmed that both KK and TK were at home, actively using their phones all day. With that, they showed that they will still go to great lengths to investigate some people, even if those people have the strongest alibi we have seen in this case to date.
I'm glad we can at least all agree her phone didn't magically just switch back on. So, who turned it on? Was it RA?I don’t have one as I will hear it at trial where there will be a more logical explanation than her phone magically switching back on. IMO
Dunno'. One thing more to add to the conspiracy I guess. I love how many thought EF didn't own a vehicle or didn't drive. Wonder how he has a DL? Certainly he didn't drive without one? MOO
And they once again bring other people into the mix with no solid evidence just suppositions. MOI think you might be right about this being written for the fan base.
By now, they likely know how much we enjoy reading legal docs, appeals, whatever. We thank them for the Constitutional Provisions, the Rules, the Treatises, Other Authorities and especially the 24 Cases cited.
I am very sure that they will come to trial with all the receipts, timestamps, videos, phone logs, witness testimonies, CAST reports and GPS data needed to verify a minute by minute timeline. IMO
For clarity, all of the details of the investigation haven’t been publicly released. In fact, zero reports have been released. What has been released is a carefully curated collection of paraphrased statements prepared by the defense. Not quite the same.Having read the details surrounding the investigation into this person, I believe that a search warrant should have been issued, as did the two FBI agents and the Assistant Police Chief on the task force and they obviously know far more than I do.
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
Loads of cases are solved on circumstantial evidence. True. Circumstantial evidence is just as valid as physical evidence.
RA admits he was there between 1.30-3.30pm Debatable. He also said he left at 1:30 on the only known recorded statement. The other one is by memory (and open to misinterpreation).
He admits he was out on the bridge and a witness can place him there moments before the girls cross The witness described a man who looks nothing like RA.
He admits he was dressed similarly as BG True.
He is a dead ringer in size for the video VERY debatable. For instance, I don't think he looks anything like BG.
He has no alibi We don't know this yet.
His gun ejected a bullet at the crime scene We don't know this yet. We haven't heard from ballistics experts about this controversial science.
So you only have to look at these and say 2-2=4 This is the second time you have said 2-2=4, when in fact 2+2=4. Am I missing your meaning here or is this a typo?
And unlike the defense I don’t need to twist or ignore the evidence here.
DNA would be nice, but there is still a ton of stuff that points to him being the killer. Even if you say a few could be simply a coincidence, then when you weigh them all together the probability gets higher and higher than that he is the killer.
Moo
I wanted to respond to a lot of the things you said, so I just did so within the block quote.
RSBM
Unfortunately we've already heard testimony from an expert during the 3 day hearings that the individual you reference above who made the shape in her dying moments is now deceased.
Justice for these girls.
I am still catching up but oh my gosh. We've gone from "Hail Odin" to "Hail Lake"? At this point it's actual reading of patterns in clouds. IMO.From Franks 1:
View attachment 524902
The marking on the tree was an Ansuz rune and the message at the scene was “Hail Odin”. BH had posted a “creepy self-drawn illustration” with this rune, and is an example of “one of the many Easter eggs [BH] left behind on his Facebook page on multiple posts.”
From the defense’s response to the state’s motion in limine that was filed today:
View attachment 524904
The Ansuz rune is now a Laguz rune. We no longer have “Hail Odin” or the Easter eggs on BH’s Facebook page. We don’t have a creepy drawing that he posted on Facebook with the same symbol as the tree.
Very odd…
JMO