photographer4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 4,527
- Reaction score
- 25,803
So how do they decide on an expert to use as a witness? I imagine they do a consult and find someone who will say their theory is correct or who offers them clarity on what this or that may have meant or what happened at the scene. I believe they’re paid to provide their testimony / expert opinion, are they not? For their time, travel, etc? I would like to ask the State how many people they met with to ask about the blood spatter / F and how they decided on this guy over anyone else? Were there other experts who didn’t conclude that this was a handprint made by a dying girl? Any of their experts consulted think it was a rune etc?I think this is an overlooked point.
This state expert doesn't have the goal to convict anyone in particular.