Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #195

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I think the context of those statements he made were other girls, not Abby and Libby. I believe that's why officers wanted to talk to RA's daughter's friends. If I'm remembering correctly.
Can you please site a source for this?

This is extremely irresponsible to post without a source in my opinion.
 
Not a lawyer - how many times can a mistrial happen before the state is forced to drop a case (any case, not just this particular case)?
Not a lawyer either, but have learned from other cases. In the event of a hung jury, the state is free to try the case again if they choose to do so. They can do this as often as they like.

And there’s no statute of limitations on murder.
 
I could very easily see this happening just based on how many people I have seen online who do not believe RA is guilty at all, vs how many believe he is - based only on whatever has been made public to date (erroneously or otherwise) by either side! moo
Potential jurors should not have been following this case online. They should be questioned during voir dire. Sadly, the defense released a great deal of click-bait speculation, despite the gag order, so many of the potential jury pool may already be tainted.

jmo
 
"He was really concerned about the photos they were going to see
Harshman has eluded that there will be way more confessions by trial. He still had more to listen to. Keep in mind the 61 are detailed enough to count for trial. There were others. At this time Richard Allen is on trial.

At one time I said I would dread the day the thread was updated to remove the the girl's name. Now, I can't wait. The State of Indiana vs Richard M. Allen.
Exactly there are still calls, etc. from Richard Allen in real time as constant discovery coming out. I am interested in what he is currently stating.
 
Yes, but he didn't disclose / wasn't asked what the specifics of those "confessions" were or who says he made them? I think he only excluded the inmate companions from the list of people he was talking about, but I'm not 100% on that so pls do not quote me and MOOOO. We also weren't told whether the statements were made before or after he got disclosure. Imo possible he saw / read something in the disclosure only the killer would know and that may have formed the basis of his "confessions". To me, people saying he made incriminating statements simply is not good enough - I want to know what he said, to whom, when, in what exact context and what else was going on at the time (eg: how was his mental health? Meds? Had they just been changed or dose changed? Etc etc). I want very specific info, not just a he said things.... Surely that will come at trial.
LE were looking for sharp instruments but I
doubt that anyone, including law enforcement, even thought of a box cutter as the possible murder weapon.

Holeman confirmed that box cutters were issued to employees at RA's job.

If the State has performed tests in regards to the same type of box cutter that was issued at RA's work, and they match and/or are consistent with the girls' wounds, he's a goner.

That is something ONLY the killer would know.

I doubt box cutter is in any type of discovery in this case prio to RA's confessions. Imo.
 
Why if you knew you had a uniquely short man would you not release that information to the public since height and weight are usually on the posters anyway? LE would know someone who understood angles and light might be able to figure it out from the video anyway although I have never heard anyone ever did figure out the height of the man in Liberty German's video.

Excellent questions. I said I would be shocked if the State had an expert on the stand to determine this because I 100% believe it can't be done.

IMO MOO
 
I firmly believe that NM was confirming that one of RA's confessions contained a reference to a box cutter during rebuttal of Dr.PM.

I am of the opinion that the murder weapon could have been a box cutter and before you dismiss this outright take a look at Google images of box cutter wounds. Warning: Some are very graphic.
 
Can you please site a source for this?

Perhaps it’s this?

BBM
“Allen also reportedly expressed sorrow to another inmate over “molesting Abby, Libby and others which he specifically named.”
 
I could very easily see this happening just based on how many people I have seen online who do not believe RA is guilty at all, vs how many believe he is - based only on whatever has been made public to date (erroneously or otherwise) by either side! moo

Respectfully pretrial online opinion is not a reliable indicator of how a Jury will vote once the trial has concluded and the evidence presented. It’s definitely too soon to predict a mistrial or hung jury.
 
I could very easily see this happening just based on how many people I have seen online who do not believe RA is guilty at all, vs how many believe he is - based only on whatever has been made public to date (erroneously or otherwise) by either side! moo

Absolutely. I've never followed a case so divided, and usually the jury goes how public opinion goes. I predict a hung jury on this one. There simply isn't enough (that we know of yet, anyway) to convict. We'll be at this for years and years and years. I fear there will never be justice for Abby and Libby. :(

MOO IMO
 
Absolutely. I've never followed a case so divided, and usually the jury goes how public opinion goes. I predict a hung jury on this one. There simply isn't enough (that we know of yet, anyway) to convict. We'll be at this for years and years and years. I fear there will never be justice for Abby and Libby. :(

MOO IMO

What’s the reason that people online believe RA is innocent, aside from theories the judge has already ruled on which won’t be presented at trial?

It’s difficult to predict if his defense even has a plan any more.

MOO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
1,831
Total visitors
1,943

Forum statistics

Threads
603,780
Messages
18,163,008
Members
231,860
Latest member
CamSoup
Back
Top