Inthedetails
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 26,341
- Reaction score
- 164,953
I don't recall the implication that the girls were doing anything incriminating, but I do remember from the start LE urging parents to know what their kids were doing online. I think I have that memory right (but it's been years).I don't want to unsuccessfully search for a link, but I remember, that LE (was it DC himself??) said, the girls were doing something incriminating, when BG/RA approached them, and it wouldn't be pleasant, when the parents would have to learn of it at the end.
THAT in mind also, one can't think of a situation, where NOT all played together in some still unknown form: the predator on phone, the possible meeting-point, the possible meeting-time and not least the predator in the form of RA on the bridge. I bet, there are indeed connections, and soon we will see.
I do think the girls went to the bridge because of some online conversation that morning.
However, I also think that's a false lead.
I think it was a crime of opportunity. I also think if the crime didn't happen that day, it's entirely possible RA never would've committed a crime. For some reason, that was the day.
jmo