Know this wasn't directed at me as the threads have moved so fast, I don't think I've even commented since Thread 2 or 3, but figured I would respond anyway, since your comment (I think) can lead to an interesting discussion.
I'm judgemental of both. However, he's been a long time criminal. Once you've admitted to murder, what else is there that you can do that would shock or surprise people or cause more judgement? To me, he's less interesting to ponder and discuss (or judge) He's simply a bad guy still doing bad guy things.
Vicky, however, seemed to be a good employee, a law abiding citizen, responsible, etc Things seemed to suddenly and rapidly change for her, and at an age and time in her life when it's not usually common to change so drastically and in such a bad way. So, I find her more interesting in terms of the hows and whys.
The judgemental part (for me) comes from a place of her being a bit like a wolf in sheep's clothing; Because of her job, it's almost a feeling of betrayal to society. She is supposed to help keep citizens protected and safe from "the bad guys" instead, she did the opposite and purposely let a dangerous criminal loose. He's been a wolf in wolfs clothing for a long time, so no one expects good, law abiding behavior from him. That's why I judge her more than him; because I expected better from someone like her than I do from someone like him.